Electronics Forum | Thu Sep 19 16:58:04 EDT 2002 | dragonslayr
You definitely need to have live demos of each system, using your specific assembly if you want to compare apples to apples. Each of the AOI OEM's you mentioned have plus amd minus to their unique systems. You will need to evaluate your specific nee
Electronics Forum | Mon Sep 23 13:08:47 EDT 2002 | dragonslayr
Daan has made a valid point with regards to expertise and use of a machine. Yet I recognize that with advanced technology, trades must occur. A hghly sophisticated AOI unit can and will help reduce overall cost of production. Therefore, a need to ha
Electronics Forum | Fri Aug 03 09:21:08 EDT 2001 | Ian T
hi my company is planing to purchase an aoi system to be used inline. is there anyone out there doing this, if so do you use all the machine options (pattern character recognition, bad board marks, correct part polarity...) or do you dumb it down(pa
Electronics Forum | Fri Aug 03 17:00:57 EDT 2001 | mparker
Start with a definition of what you expect the AOI to achieve at each station. Will your in-line machine be post print? Place (pre-reflow) or post reflow? Rather than buy one very expensive machine to put at the end of the line, maybe a couple of
Electronics Forum | Wed Sep 28 22:06:59 EDT 2016 | proy
I have a functional RTI 6250 AOI machine which I no longer use. My primary AOI is Yestech, and I do not see any use for the old one. The maintenance of two programs is way too much work even to just use it for presence and polarity. Has anyone else u
Electronics Forum | Wed Oct 21 01:46:57 EDT 1998 | Daniel
We currently using the Panasert SMT machine where PCB flow direction were from right to left, & we are planning to move in the FUJI -CP3 & CP4-2 in line where standard PCB flow direction were left to right. Any comment on FUJI machine modification of
Electronics Forum | Wed Mar 08 23:40:43 EST 2006 | fastek
If......... 1) Assuming you are panelizing them (you would have to actually).... 2) You don't have any fine pitch parts on the board then I would suggest a chipshooter like a Fuji CP-6 or a Panasonic MV2F. Get (2) of these used for around $100K ea
Electronics Forum | Thu Mar 09 00:45:57 EST 2006 | kent_peterson
Fastek will get it done with 2 machine and 2 shifts. 2 shifts would need to place 50,000cph. One CP643 with both device tables set could get it done. Having it panelized in 50's, you would need to print 50 panels a hour so get a auto cleaner on the p
Electronics Forum | Thu Oct 02 01:59:06 EDT 2008 | edmaya33
Obviously nobody can help you Jack. 1. its the camera for parts recognition ( enhanced CMOS ). 2. positioning system upgraded from ball screw to linear motor/gantry. before CPH=16500 new CPH=18000 using H12S
Electronics Forum | Fri Oct 03 07:49:19 EDT 2008 | grantp
Hi, I just saw the new NXT machines at globaltronics in Singapore, and mostly they are faster. However what was interesting is Fuji shows a prototype of the new XPF machine, but it was called XPF-W which handles really large PCB's and uses the sam
