Electronics Forum | Thu Mar 29 09:15:42 EDT 2007 | chrissieneale
Humm OK - sort of what i thought - So 90% of the time it's something else - but I assume that if you say that you are fairly confindent that you have a robus process around BGAs - where as i do not. Can we assume that it is actually the BGAs (as so
Electronics Forum | Wed Jan 06 23:01:48 EST 1999 | Dave F
| | Youse: This is SMTnet Steve. Sacrifice the socket. By the time you finish putzing-around removing the balls to get the socket off the board, replacing the lifted pads on the board, and reballing the socket; you've burnt the $100 that the socke
Electronics Forum | Mon Oct 14 09:31:46 EDT 2002 | russ
First off, are you planning on placing these parts with your placement machine since you mentioned that you do not have an alignment system for rework? I would be leery of handplacing a BGA into paste by steady hand and craned neck alignment. Seco
Electronics Forum | Wed Jan 06 21:56:37 EST 1999 | Steve Gregory
| Youse: This is SMTnet Steve. Sacrifice the socket. By the time you finish putzing-around removing the balls to get the socket off the board, replacing the lifted pads on the board, and reballing the socket; you've burnt the $100 that the socket
Electronics Forum | Wed Jan 06 23:49:48 EST 1999 | Chris G.
| Hey All you Einsteins out there!! | | I gotta' problem...('course you do Steve, or you wouldn't be bugging the TechNet now would you?) I had a phone call from a acquaintance of mine wanting to bring two prototype boards over to rework a BGA socket
Electronics Forum | Mon Oct 14 17:59:45 EDT 2002 | russ
When I used the micro-stencils, We purchased the holder from the stencil manufacturer. As far as design we used 5mil stencils for uBGAs,6-7 mil for larger 63/37 balls, and 8 mil for CBGAs. Aperture openings used were slightly smaller than what we wo
Electronics Forum | Thu Jan 07 16:46:05 EST 1999 | Steve Gregory
Hey ya'll!! SUCCESS! I was able to get that monster off!...(Now I just gotta' be able to get it back on right...hehehe) If you remember, the whole reason I had to rework it was because somehow they got the hole positions wrong in the board for
Electronics Forum | Wed Jan 06 19:43:15 EST 1999 | Steve Gregory
Hey All you Einsteins out there!! I gotta' problem...('course you do Steve, or you wouldn't be bugging the TechNet now would you?) I had a phone call from a acquaintance of mine wanting to bring two prototype boards over to rework a BGA socket, (act
Electronics Forum | Wed Jan 06 21:17:31 EST 1999 | Dave F
| Hey All you Einsteins out there!! | | I gotta' problem...('course you do Steve, or you wouldn't be bugging the TechNet now would you?) I had a phone call from a acquaintance of mine wanting to bring two prototype boards over to rework a BGA socket
Electronics Forum | Fri Nov 09 16:57:27 EST 2001 | davef
Sure, it�s fine to use the proper amount of flux and no solder when reworking BGA. Recognize that these new solder connections have less metal and a lower standoff than similar BGA solder connections that have not been reworked. This undoubtedly
