Electronics Forum | Tue Jan 12 12:51:00 EST 1999 | David
| | _|__|__|__|__|_ | | | | | | | |_ __ __ __ __ _ | | | | | | | | | | 2. Direction thru Wave ----------------
Electronics Forum | Wed Aug 02 04:17:21 EDT 2023 | ttheis
Possibly operator reloading rejected parts into tape/feeder in wrong orientation.
Electronics Forum | Thu Aug 17 07:53:31 EDT 2000 | Wolfgang Busko
Getting things "foolproof" is sometimes a hard effort and can cost a lot of money. Who is able to tell that it actually saves money instead of wasting it. Transfering responsibility from operators to a system may lead to a somewhat less responsible a
Electronics Forum | Fri Mar 06 12:23:39 EST 2009 | stepheniii
Are you working for an OEM? If so see if you can get your engineering department to change their "zero orientation" for the packages. At one place I believe the CAD department called them "G codes". What was really bad there was that one shape had
Electronics Forum | Mon Jul 24 03:02:35 EDT 2006 | emeto
CKH, if I understand you correct, only some components(for example 2 from 10 parts in one reel) goes wrong. there is one more. How your machine alignes the components? Vision, laser or mechanicly. The problem can come from there. If the recognition
Electronics Forum | Mon Jul 24 11:10:38 EDT 2000 | Sal
we have just started manufacturing a board which has surface mount components on side 1 and on side 2 all the thro hole components are d type connectors, (loads of them) the chances of these connectors inserted with the wrong orientation is very, ver
Electronics Forum | Mon Jul 24 10:00:08 EDT 2006 | SWAG
I think I read a thread very similar the other day but can't find it. If I remember correctly, the component database for that part was polarized and pre-orientation was used for camera inspection. It turned out that the optimization module in the
Electronics Forum | Wed Jan 13 21:58:31 EST 1999 | Dave F
| | _|__|__|__|__|_ | | | | | | | |_ __ __ __ __ _ | | | | | | | | | | 2. Direction thru Wave ----------------
Electronics Forum | Wed Aug 15 04:08:04 EDT 2018 | colinbenton
Hi Stephen, it seems they call it differently . What they need is an insruction data they can import to the machine, how the IC is soldered, the relative orientation for some parts,ect.
Electronics Forum | Tue Oct 17 01:42:34 EDT 2000 | Peter Carry
Dave, That's the funny thing, thru all that the output was pretty consistant with at least one bridge per board. * The ICs are going thru the wave in-line, according to IPC-782 figure 3-9, "Preferred IC Orientation". * Flatness of second wave is cont
.gif)
