PCB Libraries, Inc. | http://www.pcblibraries.com/Products/FPX/UserGuide/download/Footprint%20Expert%20Surface%20Mount%20Families.pdf
potential via site. It is advisable to keep legend ink off non‐tented vias or tented via holes. The not recommended location has a higher potential of a via site and the marking could collide with other parts during the part placement process
PCB Libraries, Inc. | https://www.pcblibraries.com/Forum/reusing-footprint-from-same-jedec-case-code_topic2573.html
:15pm I assume there SMT case sizes, where you can get by with one footprint (for all mfr's parts that use that SMT case size)? For example, I plan on having IPC "M" and "N" footprints, for 0603, 0805, 1206, 1210, and larger
PCB Libraries, Inc. | https://www.pcblibraries.com/Forum/reusing-footprint-from-same-jedec-case-code_topic2573_post10504.html
:15pm I assume there SMT case sizes, where you can get by with one footprint (for all mfr's parts that use that SMT case size)? For example, I plan on having IPC "M" and "N" footprints, for 0603, 0805, 1206, 1210, and larger
PCB Libraries, Inc. | https://www.pcblibraries.com/Forum/topic2573&OB=ASC.html
:15pm I assume there SMT case sizes, where you can get by with one footprint (for all mfr's parts that use that SMT case size)? For example, I plan on having IPC "M" and "N" footprints, for 0603, 0805, 1206, 1210, and larger
PCB Libraries, Inc. | https://www.pcblibraries.com/forum/topic2573&OB=ASC.html
:15pm I assume there SMT case sizes, where you can get by with one footprint (for all mfr's parts that use that SMT case size)? For example, I plan on having IPC "M" and "N" footprints, for 0603, 0805, 1206, 1210, and larger
PCB Libraries, Inc. | https://www.pcblibraries.com/forum/three-pin-ferrite-beads_topic629_post2132.html
? The recommended footprint from Murata is very odd and of course it defies naming conventions or standard footprint generation. The land pattern that I inherited basically looks like a 1206 with an extra pad in the middle, but that is far from the recommended shape, which is odd since the end pads are narrower than the part
PCB Libraries, Inc. | https://www.pcblibraries.com/forum/three-pin-ferrite-beads_topic629_post2133.html
? The recommended footprint from Murata is very odd and of course it defies naming conventions or standard footprint generation. The land pattern that I inherited basically looks like a 1206 with an extra pad in the middle, but that is far from the recommended shape, which is odd since the end pads are narrower than the part
PCB Libraries, Inc. | https://www.pcblibraries.com/forum/topic629&OB=DESC.html
? The recommended footprint from Murata is very odd and of course it defies naming conventions or standard footprint generation. The land pattern that I inherited basically looks like a 1206 with an extra pad in the middle, but that is far from the recommended shape, which is odd since the end pads are narrower than the part
PCB Libraries, Inc. | https://www.pcblibraries.com/forum/RSS_does-capacitor-height-affect-pad-geometry_topic2366.xml
-kcj4n7hs.pngAre there any guidelines regarding the footprint size in relation to height in IPC7351? Unfortunately I still have the original version of the standard, not B
PCB Libraries, Inc. | https://www.pcblibraries.com/forum/topic2813&OB=ASC.html
" (any misrepresentation due to improper snipping is unintentional):
Tom H wrote:
