Technical Library | 2023-08-16 18:02:27.0
One of our customers in the medical industry requested dam and fill application testing on a Kapton substrate. The material needed to be non-conductive for dispensing around electrical components, acting as structural support. Ultimately the product will be folded, therefore the footprint had to be small.
Technical Library | 2007-06-21 17:03:16.0
The rapid assimilation of Ball Grid Array (BGA) and other Area Array Package technology in the electronics industry is due to the fact that this package type allows for a greater I/O count in a smaller area while maintaining a pitch that allows for ease of manufacture (...) While there have been several studies comparing these two attachment methods, this study highlights the effect of rework technique on the electrical characteristics and reliability of reworked BGAs.
Technical Library | 2023-11-14 02:36:41.0
Understanding In-Circuit Testing (ICT) with PCBA ICT Testing Machine In-Circuit Testing, commonly known as ICT, stands as a sophisticated and precise method within electronics manufacturing. It serves to evaluate the functionality and integrity of individual electronic components on a Printed Circuit Board (PCB). The process employs specialized equipment called ICT Testers, meticulously designed to pinpoint defects, shorts, opens, and other potential issues within the PCB assembly. The Crucial Role of PCBA ICT Testing Machine 1. Quality Assurance ICT is pivotal in ensuring the overall quality and reliability of electronic products. Early identification and rectification of defects in the production process help manufacturers avoid costly recalls, rework, and post-production issues. 2. Cost-Efficiency ICT significantly reduces manufacturing costs by identifying defects at an early stage. This results in fewer defective units reaching the end of the production line, minimizing waste and rework. 3. Faster Time-to-Market Manufacturers can expedite the production process with ICT by swiftly identifying and resolving issues. This leads to faster product launches, providing a competitive edge in the market. Unveiling the Functions of PCBA ICT Testing Machine The ICT Tester, the core of the In-Circuit Testing process, conducts a battery of tests on each PCB, including: 1. Continuity Testing Checks for open circuits, ensuring all connections are properly established. 2. Component Verification Verifies the presence and orientation of components, ensuring alignment with the PCB design. 3. Functional Testing Some ICT Testers execute functional tests, assessing electronic components' performance as per specifications. 4. Short Testing Identifies unintended connections or shorts between different components on the PCB. 5. Insulation Testing Checks for isolation between different circuits, ensuring no undesired connections or paths. 6. Programming and Configuration In some cases, ICT Testers are used to program and configure specific components on the PCB. Advantages of PCBA ICT Testing Machine 1. High Precision ICT offers unparalleled accuracy in defect detection, making it crucial in modern electronics manufacturing. 2. Speed and Efficiency ICT Testers enable rapid testing, allowing manufacturers to assess a large number of PCBs in a short time. 3. Customization ICT Tests can be tailored to suit specific PCB requirements, ensuring thorough evaluation of every design aspect. 4. Data Collection ICT Testers gather valuable data for process optimization and quality control. In-Circuit Testing (ICT) is fundamental in electronics manufacturing, safeguarding product quality, reducing costs, and accelerating time-to-market. The ICT Tester, with its precision and efficiency, positions manufacturers at the forefront of the highly competitive electronics industry. Embracing ICT is not just a choice; it's a necessity for manufacturers striving for excellence in their products. I.C.T is a leading manufacturer of full SMT line machines in the electronic manufacturing industry. Discover how we can enhance product quality, boost performance, and reduce costs. Contact us at info@smt11.com for reliable global supply, unparalleled efficiency, and superior technical service.
Technical Library | 2023-04-17 21:17:59.0
The purpose of this paper is to evaluate and compare the effectiveness and sensitivity of different cleanliness verification tests for post soldered printed circuit board assemblies (PCBAs) to provide an understanding of current industry practice for ionic contamination detection limits. Design/methodology/approach – PCBAs were subjected to different flux residue cleaning dwell times and cleanliness levels were verified with resistivity of solvent extract, critical cleanliness control (C3) test, and ion chromatography analyses to provide results capable of differentiating different sensitivity levels for each test. Findings – This study provides an understanding of current industry practice for ionic contamination detection using verification tests with different detection sensitivity levels. Some of the available cleanliness monitoring systems, particularly at critical areas of circuitry that are prone to product failure and residue entrapment, may have been overlooked. Research limitations/implications – Only Sn/Pb, clean type flux residue was evaluated. Thus, the current study was not an all encompassing project that is representative of other chemistry-based flux residues. Practical implications – The paper provides a reference that can be used to determine the most suitable and effective verification test for the detection of ionic contamination on PCBAs. Originality/value – Flux residue-related problems have long existed in the industry. The findings presented in this paper give a basic understanding to PCBA manufacturers when they are trying to choose the most suitable and effective verification test for the detection of ionic contamination on their products. Hence, the negative impact of flux residue on the respective product's long-term reliability and performance can be minimized and monitored effectively.
Technical Library | 2019-04-07 23:34:10.0
Ingress Protection Test Chamber is used to determine the protection degree of product enclosures,the protection level provided by the enclosure is called IP code,our IP test chamber compeletely follow the standard IEC60529 and others. IP protection grade is an important index of electrical equipment safety protection. Protective-grade systems such as ip, which provide a method of classifying products in terms of dust-proof, waterproof and anti-collision levels of electrical equipment and packaging, which have been recognized by most European countries, as drafted by the International Electrotechnical Association (iec (international electro technical commission). And announced in ied529 (bs en 60529 / 1992) outer packing protection grade (ip code). The level of protection is expressed in terms of IP followed by two numbers, which are used to define the level of protection. The first number indicates the extent of the equipment‘s resistance to dust, or the degree to which people are protected from harm in sealed environments. I represents a level that prevents solid foreign matter from entering, with a maximum level of 6; The second number indicates the extent to which the equipment is waterproof. P represents the level of protection against influent and the highest level is 8. Such as the protection level of the motor ip65. Contact electrical equipment protection and external material protection level (first digit) Electrical equipment waterproof protection level (second digit) . IP is the international code used to identify the protection grade ip grade consists of two numbers, the first number for dust, and the second number for waterproof, the larger the number means the better protection level.
Technical Library | 2013-04-04 15:28:39.0
This paper will outline and define what requirements must be adhered to for the OEM community to truly achieve the IPC class product from the Electrical Test standpoint. This will include the test point optimization matrix, Isolation (shorts) parameters and Continuity (opens) parameters. This paper will also address the IPC Class III/A additional requirements for Aerospace and Military Avionics. The disconnect exists between OEMs understanding the requirements of their specific IPC class design versus the signature that will be presented from their design. This results in many Class III builds failing at Electrical Test... First published in the 2012 IPC APEX EXPO technical conference proceedings
Technical Library | 2012-12-14 14:28:20.0
This paper examines the potential failure mechanisms that can damage modern lowvoltage CMOS devices and their relationship to electrical testing. Failure mechanisms such as electrostatic discharge (ESD), CMOS latch-up, and transistor gate oxide degradation can occur as a result of electrical over-voltage stress (EOS). In this paper, EOS due to electrical testing is examined and an experiment is conducted using pulsed voltage waveforms corresponding to conditions encountered during in-circuit electrical testing. Experimental results indicate a correlation between amplitude and duration of the pulse waveform and device degradation due to one or more of the failure mechanisms.
Technical Library | 2016-04-08 01:19:52.0
PCB assembly designs become more complex year-on-year, yet early-stage form/fit compliance verification of all designed-in components to the intended manufacturing processes remains a challenge. So long as librarians at the design and manufacturing levels continue to maintain their own local standards for component representation, there is no common representation in the design-to-manufacturing phase of the product lifecycle that can provide the basis for transfer of manufacturing process rules to the design level. A comprehensive methodology must be implemented for all component types, not just the minority which happen to conform to formal packaging standards, to successfully left-shift assembly and test DFM analysis to the design level and thus compress NPI cycle times.(...)This paper will demonstrate the technological components of the working solution: the logic for deriving repeatable and standardized package and pin classifications from a common source of component physical-model content, the method for associating DFA and DFT rules to those classifications, and the transfer of those rules to separate DFM and NPI analysis tools elsewhere in the design-through-manufacturing chain resulting in a consistent DFM process across multiple design and manufacturing organizations.
Technical Library | 2015-08-13 15:52:40.0
Pad cratering has become more prevalent with the switch to lead free solders and lead free compatible laminates. This mainly is due to the use of higher reflow temperature, stiffer Pb-free solder alloys, and the more brittle Pb-free compatible laminates. However, pad cratering is difficult to detect by monitoring electric resistance since pad cratering initiates before an electrical failure occurs. Several methods have been developed to evaluate laminate materials' resistance to pad cratering. Pad-solder level tests include ball shear, ball pull and pin pull. The detailed methods for ball shear, ball pull, and pin pull testing are documented in an industry standard IPC-9708. Bansal, et al. proposed to use acoustic emission (AE) sensors to detect pad cratering during four-point bend test. Currently there is an industry-working group working on test guidelines for acoustic emission measurement during mechanical testing.
Technical Library | 2013-03-28 16:18:22.0
For the last couple of years, the main concerns regarding the electrical performance of blank PCB boards were impedance and ohmic resistance. Just recently, the need to reduce insertion loss came up in discussions with blank board customers (...) The paper describes the test vehicle and the testing methodology and discusses in detail the electrical performance characteristics. The influence of the independent variables on the performance characteristics is presented. Finally the thermal reliability of the boards built applying different copper foils and oxide replacements was investigated.
.gif)
