PCB Libraries, Inc. | https://www.pcblibraries.com/Forum/revision-control-date-time-stamp_topic843.html
: 20 Mar 2012 Location: Oxfordshire, UK Status: Offline Points: 576 Post Options Post Reply Quote jameshead Report Post Thanks(0) Quote Reply Posted: 06 Feb 2013 at 4:13am I wouldn't need a date/time stamp, rev, nor change description column since I maintain all my fpx and Pulsonix libraries, together with our CAD data on a PDM system that already does this
PCB Libraries, Inc. | https://www.pcblibraries.com/Forum/revision-control-date-time-stamp_topic843_post3006.html
: 20 Mar 2012 Location: Oxfordshire, UK Status: Offline Points: 576 Post Options Post Reply Quote jameshead Report Post Thanks(0) Quote Reply Posted: 06 Feb 2013 at 4:13am I wouldn't need a date/time stamp, rev, nor change description column since I maintain all my fpx and Pulsonix libraries, together with our CAD data on a PDM system that already does this
PCB Libraries, Inc. | https://www.pcblibraries.com/Forum/revision-control-date-time-stamp_topic843_post3380.html
: 20 Mar 2012 Location: Oxfordshire, UK Status: Offline Points: 576 Post Options Post Reply Quote jameshead Report Post Thanks(0) Quote Reply Posted: 06 Feb 2013 at 4:13am I wouldn't need a date/time stamp, rev, nor change description column since I maintain all my fpx and Pulsonix libraries, together with our CAD data on a PDM system that already does this
PCB Libraries, Inc. | https://www.pcblibraries.com/forum/topic843&OB=ASC.html
: 20 Mar 2012 Location: Oxfordshire, UK Status: Offline Points: 576 Post Options Post Reply Quote jameshead Report Post Thanks(0) Quote Reply Posted: 06 Feb 2013 at 4:13am I wouldn't need a date/time stamp, rev, nor change description column since I maintain all my fpx and Pulsonix libraries, together with our CAD data on a PDM system that already does this
PCB Libraries, Inc. | https://www.pcblibraries.com/Forum/RSS_orcadcapture_forum19.xml
? Author: NightwishSubject: IPC naming convention for schematic symbols?Posted: 24 May 2012 at 1:02amRandy and Bryan, I also agree with you guys that this has something to do with the software you use and even the part number naming convention in the PDM system
PCB Libraries, Inc. | https://www.pcblibraries.com/Forum/RSS_ipc-naming-convention-for-schematic-symbols_topic54.xml
:02amRandy and Bryan, I also agree with you guys that this has something to do with the software you use and even the part number naming convention in the PDM system
PCB Libraries, Inc. | https://www.pcblibraries.com/forum/ipc-naming-convention-for-schematic-symbols_topic54_post443.html
, I also agree with you guys that this has something to do with the software you use and even the part number naming convention in the PDM system
PCB Libraries, Inc. | https://www.pcblibraries.com/Forum/topic54&OB=ASC.html
, I also agree with you guys that this has something to do with the software you use and even the part number naming convention in the PDM system
PCB Libraries, Inc. | https://www.pcblibraries.com/Forum/ipc-naming-convention-for-schematic-symbols_topic54_post683.html
, I also agree with you guys that this has something to do with the software you use and even the part number naming convention in the PDM system
PCB Libraries, Inc. | https://www.pcblibraries.com/Forum/ipc-naming-convention-for-schematic-symbols_topic54_post892.html
, I also agree with you guys that this has something to do with the software you use and even the part number naming convention in the PDM system
