Electronics Forum: qp2 (Page 1 of 2)

Automated board labeling system.

Electronics Forum | Thu Dec 13 15:35:14 EST 2007 | mulder0990

Our plant does not use an automated process, but I have done some research to the LPF Label Feeder by hover davis. It is for the Fuji IP, QP2, QP3, XP. Hope that will point you in some direction or get this thread started.

Re: QP2 vs GSM

Electronics Forum | Fri May 29 08:23:38 EDT 1998 | John Ryder

Jerry, Have you also considered the Philips ACM? It is one of the most accurate and flexible placers in the world. Check it out on our web site www.philips-ia.com =JR=

QP2 vs GSM

Electronics Forum | Fri May 22 07:59:14 EDT 1998 | Jerry

We are currently comparing the Fuji QP2 machine to the Universal GSM. The primary use will be for QFP's down to .4 mm pitch and for 300+I/O BGAs. My initial input has been that you spend alot of time tweeking PD's on the QP because the vision syste

Re: QP2 vs GSM

Electronics Forum | Thu May 28 18:16:40 EDT 1998 | Ian Bates

| We are currently comparing the Fuji QP2 machine to the Universal GSM. The primary use will be for QFP's down to .4 mm pitch and for 300+I/O BGAs. My initial input has been that you spend alot of time tweeking PD's on the QP because the vision sys

Re: about QP242

Electronics Forum | Thu Nov 18 14:40:18 EST 1999 | John Queen

Hi Charley Having worked on the QP2 for some time now i have my doubts about its versatility,this machine is my opinion a cheaper alternative to the IP3,which is far more accurate and more reliable. I would advise yo

Re: QP2 vs GSM

Electronics Forum | Wed Jun 10 17:13:56 EDT 1998 | FAC

Fuji formed a partnership with UniCam Software to better meet our customers expanding software needs. The resulting product, FujiCam, is based on UniCam's field proven programming tool (4 years on market) and provides greater management of the entir

Re: You choose: F4G or MCS-30

Electronics Forum | Mon Oct 11 17:15:03 EDT 1999 | Mike H

| Just curious as to everyones thoughts on if you could chose to use F4G or an MCS-30. Which would you chose and why? | | | Larry J | |Larry, depending to your Fuji machines, if you are using any new machines like QP1 or QP2 and any other ones li

Re: QP2 vs GSM

Electronics Forum | Wed Jun 10 14:16:08 EDT 1998 | Robert Reilly

Jerry, I have been using the GSM for about 4.5 years. In my opinion this machine offers the most flexibility and upgradeability of any machine. The ease of use of the software is far superior to any other I have used . Hopefully you are using the

upgrading pnp

Electronics Forum | Thu Feb 07 05:18:08 EST 2008 | muarty

If there is a budget available, rather than looking at a Fuji CP7. Being issued with small strips of components would prove to be a nightmare with this style of placement machine. I would try to consider the Fuji AIM machine for use as the chipshoote

Re: QP2 vs GSM

Electronics Forum | Fri Jun 26 13:52:05 EDT 1998 | jcc

| We are currently comparing the Fuji QP2 machine to the Universal GSM. The primary use will be for QFP's down to .4 mm pitch and for 300+I/O BGAs. My initial input has been that you spend alot of time tweeking PD's on the QP because the vision sys

  1 2 Next

qp2 searches for Companies, Equipment, Machines, Suppliers & Information

PCB Handling with CE

Nozzles, Feeders, Spare Parts - Siemens, Fuji, Juki, Yamaha, etc...
Voidless Reflow Soldering

High Throughput Reflow Oven
SMTAI 2024 - SMTA International

World's Best Reflow Oven Customizable for Unique Applications
PCB Handling Machine with CE

High Resolution Fast Speed Industrial Cameras.
Fully Automatic BGA Rework Station

Original SMT Feeders and spares for Panasonic, Fuji , Yamaha, Juki , Samsung