Electronics Forum: j-std-001 and pdf (Page 1 of 9)

J-STD-001 Par 4.2.2 Temperature and Humidity

Electronics Forum | Wed Jul 18 11:49:59 EDT 2007 | davef

The auditor may be using "verify" in an ESD Program context. See ANSI/ESD S20.20 [1999], 6.1.3, Compliance Verification Plan. It gives one definition of what the auditor may be seeking. For more on verification programs, look here: http://www.protek

Humidity and temperature

Electronics Forum | Thu Sep 15 08:39:10 EDT 2016 | davef

J-STD-001 Revision F with Amendment 1

IPC-A-610 and IPC J-STD-001 Updations

Electronics Forum | Mon Jul 24 07:18:51 EDT 2017 | jamesbarnhart

IPC has updated assembly standards for IPC A-610 and IPC JSTD-001 making them easier to use and adding information in areas that have evolved. Both IPC J-STD-001E and IPC-A-610E have also been more closely linked to eliminating the differences that c

IPC-A-610 and IPC J-STD-001 Updations

Electronics Forum | Mon Jul 24 09:15:32 EDT 2017 | davef

James: This is not "breaking news." IPC-A-610F, Acceptability of Electronic Assemblies was released in July 2014. Both, ... * IPC-A-610G, Acceptability of Electronic Assemblies * J-STD-001G, Requirements for Soldered Electrical and Electronic Assem

Acceptable per J-STD-001 and IPC-A-610 Class 3?

Electronics Forum | Thu May 23 07:50:04 EDT 2013 | icin

The attached images appear to be a result of a touchup process. We believe that this is not a fracture, but more of a condition where the solder touchup process did not completely flow the solder. Is this acceptable per J-STD-001 and IPC-A-610 Class

J-STD-001 Par 4.2.2 Temperature and Humidity

Electronics Forum | Wed Jul 18 10:35:41 EDT 2007 | hussman

This seems like an odd request from an auditor. I can see an auditor requiring proof that you meet the J-Std, but verify? This would require you purposely damage product on a "before and after" scenario. As long as your manufacturing guideline say

J-STD-002 and -003 solderability testing...

Electronics Forum | Fri Jun 29 14:15:00 EDT 2001 | stefo

This is a question about complying with J-STD-001 solderability testing. Do any of you have your vendors certify that the components and PCB's that you buy from them comply with the solderabilty requirements spelled out in the -002 and -003, in lieu

Flux Designations and Composition

Electronics Forum | Tue Jun 29 14:42:55 EDT 2004 | davef

You're correct, for every dumpster full of paper written about solder, there's a sentance written about fluxes. There's dribs and drabs about fluxes in most of the soldering books [ie, Manko, Klein-Wassink, Judd, Strauss, etc] and most of that is ve

J-STD-001 Par 4.2.2 Temperature and Humidity

Electronics Forum | Wed Jul 11 14:44:21 EDT 2007 | fredericksr

Hi folks! Has anyone ever successfully verified adequate ESD control at

Acceptable per J-STD-001 and IPC-A-610 Class 3?

Electronics Forum | Thu May 23 18:10:54 EDT 2013 | davef

I agree with Rob. These solder connections are unacceptable. BR, davef

  1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next

j-std-001 and pdf searches for Companies, Equipment, Machines, Suppliers & Information

Electronics Equipment Consignment

High Precision Fluid Dispensers
PCB Handling Machine with CE

High Throughput Reflow Oven
PCB Handling with CE

World's Best Reflow Oven Customizable for Unique Applications
design with ease with Win Source obselete parts and supplies

Training online, at your facility, or at one of our worldwide training centers"