Electronics Forum: control (Page 119 of 369)

Re: DIP Conformal Coating

Electronics Forum | Mon Feb 14 12:28:04 EST 2000 | Dave F

Chris: I can't a semi-auto dip tank being any faster than manually dipping. Better control - yes. Less messy - yes. Other stuff Graham mentioned - yes. Have you discussed your goals with some of the used equipment folks listed in the archives?

Re: Process Control

Electronics Forum | Wed Feb 09 09:34:03 EST 2000 | JAX

If you are talking about failure analysis and machine utilization information try looking at CIMCIS. They have a wide variety of products that can help. You might not even need their services, most SMT equipment has software packages that will allre

Last Chance To See Mir

Electronics Forum | Tue Jan 16 09:26:25 EST 2001 | blnorman

Got this off newsblip this morning. The Associated Press MOSCOW (January 16, 2001 7:06 a.m. EST http://www.nandotimes.com) - The Russian government has tentatively scheduled the destruction of the Mir space station in a controlled collision with E

Re: Solder Paste Height

Electronics Forum | Sat Jan 06 11:39:56 EST 2001 | Steve Thomas

On a related note, I'm wondering if any of the newer devices have any way to factor in paste not releasing from the corners, or for that matter, radiused, oval, or round apertures. We have an LSMII, and all it does it let you draw a rectangle around

Quality Benchmark for SMT Processes

Electronics Forum | Thu Nov 16 16:20:23 EST 2000 | bkringen

We are a manufacturing facility of ruggedized offroad electronic control systems. We are looking for industry standards/benchmarks we can use to compare with other manufacturers with regards to our DPMO rate for our SMT process. We would like to kno

Re: Wave Solder Processs Control

Electronics Forum | Sat Nov 04 11:11:19 EST 2000 | Claudine Corda

Mark - The Waverider is a great tool. It will let you know what's going on with the machine itself - contact time in the wave, parallelism of the wave, temp, and a relative idea of whats happening in the preheat section, and conveyor speed. We hav

Re: Wave Soldering SMT IC

Electronics Forum | Mon Oct 16 20:42:22 EDT 2000 | Dave F

Pete: It sound like somewhere through all that you should have gotten good product. Here�s a couple of questions on your board: * How are the SOIC positioned relative to the wave? * How are you controlling the flatness of the second wave? * What

Re: Butt-joints

Electronics Forum | Thu Sep 14 10:27:30 EDT 2000 | Mark S

.... an 18-20 week lead-time is why we're doing this. Ideally I'd prefer to form them into gull-wing (except we'd have to do it by hand and that'd be difficult to control), but it's a hell of a lot quicker and more consistent just to run them throug

Re: Butt-joints

Electronics Forum | Thu Sep 14 11:19:59 EDT 2000 | Brian W.

It really isn't that difficult to control. Have one of your mechanical or manufacturing engineers design a quick little fixture. We used to have the same problem, then we designed a two piece fixture out of aluminum. We also had our own tape and r

Re: Longer soak time and reflow time impact Solder on Au pad?

Electronics Forum | Fri Sep 08 04:45:17 EDT 2000 | PeterB

As per Travis's reply it could be something other than the reflow process. Another good one is if the printed PCB's have been cleaned down due to print misregistration etc.. If not properly controlled paste residues can remain distributed about the p


control searches for Companies, Equipment, Machines, Suppliers & Information