Electronics Forum | Wed Aug 12 16:41:20 EDT 2009 | JWPlainview
Thanks for clearing that up, Dave. We've been getting a lot of inquiries citing both certifications. Just thought there might be a link between the two.
Electronics Forum | Wed Aug 12 23:03:05 EDT 2009 | davef
Here's a boiler plate ITAR control plan http://www.cfisac.org/Resource/tcp.doc
Electronics Forum | Thu Feb 24 14:52:29 EST 2011 | davef
The above link appear to be broken. Try this: exporttexas.com/northtexas/doc/Sample%20TCP.doc
Electronics Forum | Fri Aug 02 13:56:32 EDT 2019 | slthomas
It's not that uncommon. I've seen AS9100 certified companies use different revisions for the BOM, assembly drawing, and the product itself. In this case the product revision may be affected by either a BOM or a drawing revision, while the other r
Electronics Forum | Thu Mar 18 13:32:47 EDT 2021 | robl
No worries. If you look at the line in the foreground you'll see them changed over: https://www.wnie.online/aws-slovakia-achieves-as9100-revision-d-certification/
Electronics Forum | Fri May 16 15:10:28 EDT 2008 | arminski
hi davef, thanks for your kind replies...i have a batch aqueous cleaner in my process...but we are going to have AS9100 Audit 3rd quarter of this year...do I need to purchase a tester? right now we are sending sample boards to a 3rd party company bu
Electronics Forum | Mon Apr 15 12:45:49 EDT 2019 | slthomas
The reason I asked is that in every AS9100 or ISO13485 environment where I've been employed our equipment qualifications have included a PQ in order to provide evidence that the machine can (and did) produce product that meets or exceeds the pass/fai
Electronics Forum | Mon Apr 23 10:22:02 EDT 2018 | robl
It also depends on how good your auditors are. We are very tight on calibration and maintenance across all sites but it's definitely the UK auditors that drive us to be better. They are the ones who match historical builds against tool calibratio
Electronics Forum | Thu Aug 07 22:51:05 EDT 2008 | davef
We expect aerospace to be IPC-A-610, Class 3 and J-STD-001, Class 3. The above quality statement stecifies: * "IPC 610, Class 2 acceptability." This is unclear. Should this be "IPC-A-610, Class 2 acceptability?" * No class for J-STD-001. Should we a
Electronics Forum | Tue Jul 23 18:19:30 EDT 2019 | slthomas
It depends on what you mean by "going from....to....". If I just decided that I wanted to try a Type 4 paste on something that I'd been having problems printing, I'd probably just grab one (edited to add that we have a couple of re
Since 1986, our focus on delivering quality PCB's and Assemblies hasn't changed. Our top priority has always been to understand what the customer values, evaluate their needs and deliver the best-in-class service and products.
Manufacturer / Consultant / Service Provider
2425 Touhy Ave
Elk Grove Village, IL USA
Phone: 847-806-0003
winsouce.jpg)