Electronics Forum | Fri Jan 06 16:40:34 EST 2006 | Cmiller
We have a 3Z and a 3AV. We dont use the 3AV at all anymore and just took the 3Z out of service but we ran each for 4 years for at least 8 hours a day. We never had problems to the extent you seem to have. I did talk to someone a few years ago that sa
Electronics Forum | Thu Feb 02 09:06:53 EST 2006 | drewake
Sorry, I am jumping into this late - I'm a new user. Our company is looking to perform an evaluation for a new paste. We are looking at a 63/37 no clean - type 3 or 4. Our technology is currently at 0201s, .4mm pitch ICs & .5mm uBGAs. I have
Electronics Forum | Tue Jan 10 14:04:38 EST 2006 | Mike Konrad
Flashback time� Vapor degreasers, although still used in limited applications, no longer represent the conventional wisdom (due to multiple environmental issues). Aqueous-based technologies are the most common method of defluxing. Unlike most va
Electronics Forum | Wed Jan 11 13:08:19 EST 2006 | GS
About SACX307 for wave you can read at post: http://www.smtnet.com/Forums/Index.cfm?CFApp=1&Message_ID=38727 As I have heard, in Europe, Germany in particular, several assemblers are using SN100C for wave (also HASL) with success since years ago.
Electronics Forum | Thu Jan 12 02:08:47 EST 2006 | adeline_ko
Hi, What is the different between Electroless Nickel / Immersion Gold (ENIG) and Immersion Au. Are they refer to the same finishing? We has been using the Gold thickness (0.00005 - 0.00013mm) , nicket (0.0025mm) for all Gold finishing brd (Immersio
Electronics Forum | Wed Jan 25 03:29:04 EST 2006 | Neil
I agree Rob, The main thing is that you don't beleive everything without question. If you're sure the supplier knows what he's doing and you have a good relationship with him then a declaration should be OK. When doubt arises it is worth getting sam
Electronics Forum | Fri Jun 02 16:22:53 EDT 2006 | Randy
Do not believe every thing your suppliers tell you, even a written cert does not guaranty compliance. We recently purchased a Niton XRF analyzer. The first day in use we found component�s that were made for us "RoHS" that were far from compliant. Peo
Electronics Forum | Wed Mar 15 15:04:51 EST 2006 | Fliyer32
I tried MS2 for almost two weeks and I can see it works. MS2 is more a preventive tool rather than a solution to convert pour on top of the dross. Very important if you use this stuff is that you do the encapsulation of the wave, the bigger the surfa
Electronics Forum | Tue Jan 17 10:53:05 EST 2006 | sarar
Hi Steve, I work for an analytical laboratory that specializes in ionic cleanliness, and we have found through the variety of cleanliness issues we encounter that the Envirosense cleaning chemistries are very effective also, so you might want to add
Electronics Forum | Thu Jan 19 04:35:35 EST 2006 | pavel_murtishev
Good day, I worked with Maratnz some time ago. My own opinion is that this is limited machine with limited functions. Main disadvantages are: - Rather costly, something about 100 KEUR per table top machine; - 2D scanning system (direct light module
