Electronics Forum | Fri Jul 04 03:22:31 EDT 2014 | sramos
Thanks Rob for your meaningful advice. Instead of just a general average time per component, I think if we have 3 averages, 1 per "component group", we will gain significant accuracy in the cost model. For instance, a motherboard may have 2500+ R and
Electronics Forum | Mon May 25 08:30:48 EDT 2009 | cyber_wolf
I assure you this is no add. I have posted on here for years, and NO we do not recieve benefit from Juki. I am just a technical guy that has worked in the trenches every day with various pick and place machines over the years. Let me re-state that I
Electronics Forum | Sun May 24 14:10:42 EDT 2009 | grantp
Hi, It looks like your machines are so old, that anything built within the last 10 years would look like magic to you. Odd post, and does seem like an add for juki. Grant
Electronics Forum | Wed Jul 16 11:57:11 EDT 2014 | markhoch
We're a Tier 1 Automotive Supplier building, what I like to call, Peanut Butter and Jelly Boards. (High Volume, Low Complexity) Our first pass yield, using standard 1st Article Inspection and AOI is about 98-99% on any given day. Last night, for ex
Electronics Forum | Sun Sep 21 15:48:48 EDT 2014 | gascon5383
Our company has a process standard that requires a double person check at the beginning of every run (size of run is irrelevent, whether 20 panels or 500 panels). Every changeover that occurs a first piece inspection is made before reflow. If all is
Electronics Forum | Fri Nov 06 09:31:20 EST 2009 | adlsmt
Sounds like your contract assembler has some serious issues. You should not be getting defects anywhere neer that amount. If you do decide to go that route again find one with a good AOI machine at a minimum and you should also supply them with a fun
Electronics Forum | Wed Jul 16 14:13:17 EDT 2014 | alexeis
Hi, If you can not rely on your programmer and the tools he uses then "double checking" can save you only materials but in time you really do not save often extend meaning. There are things you can identify before the stove, but if you use tools li
Electronics Forum | Mon Sep 14 17:36:34 EDT 1998 | Robert Steltman
We are looking at a third P&P machine for our factory. I have received brochures on a SMASUNG CP30V machine. It looks great and has all the plus points for a contract manufacturing company such as ourselves. The basic specs are: 14400 cph - 3 heads
Electronics Forum | Tue Sep 15 13:30:40 EDT 1998 | Dave F
| We are looking at a third P&P machine for our factory. I have received brochures on a SMASUNG CP30V machine. It looks great and has all the plus points for a contract manufacturing company such as ourselves. The basic specs are: | 14400 cph - 3 he
Electronics Forum | Tue Jun 02 02:52:24 EDT 2009 | jasreeves
Probably covering old ground here, but when I read marketing data, brochures etc for new P&P machines, they always state the CPH. You know... 12,000 chips per hour or 18,000 chips per hour and so on and so forth. However, you try and place 0201's at
