Electronics Forum: performance and label (Page 4 of 23)

SPC and Wave

Electronics Forum | Fri Jul 15 12:41:56 EDT 2005 | russ

You are not wrong in monitoring the Product (your really not monitoring the process). This methodology is valuable if your process is unstable (SPC is used to stabilize process). There is value in "real time" inspection of a process's product as lon

Dye and Pry

Electronics Forum | Wed Mar 12 07:33:40 EDT 2008 | callckq

Hi All, One PCBA failed test after went through the Shock Test(Vibration) and suspected to be BGA solder ball crack. We performed dye and pry and found PCB's pad lifted with red mark ink penetrate pad underneath, what does this mean? Can I say the

RNETs and Lead Free

Electronics Forum | Wed May 07 15:26:05 EDT 2008 | joeherz

Interesting - We're using the same AIM products as you. On the lead free, 353, did you start out with it or did you try the WS485? That was the 1st product recommendation we got from AIM and we found that the lot to lot consistency was not good. T

Sn99Cu07 and Sn100

Electronics Forum | Thu Nov 02 04:42:48 EDT 2023 | tinaheussaff

In general, it is safer to use a single alloy with a known composition and performance characteristics. If you need to change the alloy used in your selective soldering machine bath, it is advisable to consult with the manufacturer or a soldering exp

Mydata Pick and place

Electronics Forum | Sun Aug 26 12:40:59 EDT 2001 | stefwitt

I would like to enter the discussion by tossing some numbers in. First of all I don�t like the 3 Sigma value. 3 Sigma are 2000 defects per mio. if I remember correctly. This means, if you have 200 components on the board, then every 10 boards have on

Touch-up and Inspection Process

Electronics Forum | Thu Mar 03 09:04:26 EST 2005 | russ

Been following this thread and have a question, Why do "touch-up" people follow different criteria than "Q.C." people. It sounds like the root of the problem is not addressed but bandaids are being put into place. We have no "Q.C." department and

Mydata Pick and place

Electronics Forum | Thu May 24 09:11:12 EDT 2001 | Grant Petty

Hi, I would agree. We purchased a TP9 just the slow machine, but we were a small company at the time, and it worked fantastic. Almost no maintenance, and it's a dream to changeover. The serivce in Australia is also very good, but that does not appl

Re: IQ/OQ, and PQ

Electronics Forum | Wed Sep 15 11:08:45 EDT 1999 | Dave F

| I am looking for help on doing smt equipment qualifications. I need to find some examples to follow. The equipment to be qualified is a Stencil Machine, Pick and place machine, and Reflow oven. We manufacture medical devices so it has to be somewha

Spacing and Yield

Electronics Forum | Tue Sep 18 11:34:36 EDT 2001 | jschake

The tightest spacing between neighboring 0201 components assembled was 8-mils. Please refer to the response for the query entitled �Minimizing Tombstoning Defects� posted by martys, as the response provided there is also relevant to address this que

AOI, Quality and SPC

Electronics Forum | Wed Mar 05 12:23:31 EST 2003 | msivigny

Hello Phil, We did use an Oracle relational database with an Access front end to input and query data from the system for reports. We did not perform SPC with the Oracle dB. As the whole data collection process was completely customized, we hadn't im


performance and label searches for Companies, Equipment, Machines, Suppliers & Information