Electronics Forum | Fri Feb 25 05:42:17 EST 2000 | Istv�n Dominik
Hi, We should wavesolder a PLCC44 package. The PCB is under the design procedure now and we must specify the best parameters (the orientation (45 or 90 degrees) of the package on the PCB,the number, the positon and the size of the solder thief pads
Electronics Forum | Tue Jul 25 03:30:26 EDT 2000 | gary
We got PLCC 68 components on our new products and we are not sure on what feeder pitch we are going to use for the said part as we do not have 44mm feeders. Can anyone there help me what feeders are they using for the said parts so we won't end up bu
Electronics Forum | Fri Feb 25 05:42:17 EST 2000 | Istv�n Dominik
Hi, We should wavesolder a PLCC44 package. The PCB is under the design procedure now and we must specify the best parameters (the orientation (45 or 90 degrees) of the package on the PCB,the number, the positon and the size of the solder thief pads
Electronics Forum | Tue Feb 08 12:57:42 EST 2000 | Travis Slaughter
I have had the exact thing you describe happen to me, at least it sounds the same. On the PLCC there could be maybe 1 leg not soldered or many of them tending to be in groups but not necessarily. This happened on a established board that had always
Electronics Forum | Sat Jul 25 04:39:14 EDT 1998 | Stoney Tsai
| Hi, | We have encountered one serious problem that heavy packages falling down during second side reflow, especially for PLCC 84. I believe it caused by temperature profile setting. | Any good suggestion would be highly appreciated! | Stoney Tsai *
Electronics Forum | Fri Dec 13 10:23:55 EST 2002 | davef
Bright ideas??? Bright ideas!!! I got bright ideas. In order of decreasing luminosity: * Stop installing the socket, solder the PLCC to the board, dip the board. The socket is a waste of time and money. You never replace the PLCC in the field, a
Electronics Forum | Tue Dec 06 21:48:26 EST 2005 | davef
We thought Bob Willis posted something like that a few years ago, but can't find it [real quick. Maybe someone more patient can.] Anyway, a PLCC68 weighs 4.67gm. On various PLCC size dropping or not: * upto 52 will stay put * 84 will drop
Electronics Forum | Fri Oct 17 06:24:44 EDT 2008 | tegel
Hi, When you tried vision type 254, did you change the size of the body? On 254 the body size should be the outer dimension of a component, so on a PLCC (or any other component) the leads should be included in the body size as well. One other thing r
Electronics Forum | Tue Mar 08 02:28:03 EST 2011 | nagesh
I have an issue with PLCC Insufficient Heel solder joint fillet.The aperture dimension is : 30 x 100 mils on PCB & on stencil also(1:1 per gerber).Rohs Process. My stencil thickness is 5mils due to presence of Tssop & QFP package & i cannot increase
Electronics Forum | Mon Apr 26 22:53:30 EDT 1999 | Dean
| Recently, we have been having problems with PLCC's passing vision on our IP's If the part is set up to be placed on Head 2, it will not always pass vision. However, if we move it over to Head 1, it will pass and place just fine. Now, I do realiz
