Electronics Forum | Mon Mar 19 21:55:23 EDT 2018 | stephenj37824
You've got (to my mind) 3 wholly different > classes of machine there. > > Essemtec is upper > entry level maker that is increasingly > differentiating itself from the competing > machines in its class by focusing on 3d > assembly/dispensing op
Electronics Forum | Tue Sep 26 15:48:32 EDT 2000 | Dave Hulbert
I'm a bit confused about reading IPC-275 (I know I should have IPC-2221/2222) but I'm sure they are similar. Anyway, I am doing a: Military, less than 100V, non-conformal coated PCB, External Etch Sec 5.3.1.4 Edge Spacing.. (Pg 61) says use Tabl
Electronics Forum | Wed Jul 23 08:18:29 EDT 2008 | davef
Q1. Is this a standard process for plugging? A1. Not as such. We checked both IPC-6012 and IPC-SM-840. Neither comments on plugging. So, your fabrication notes rule the day. Q2. Is this okay for such thick PCB's or is it mandatory to use a special pl
Electronics Forum | Wed Jan 31 17:45:37 EST 2001 | dason_c
Hi! William, please check the new IPC-A-610 Rev C, para 12.4.10 for the soldeirng anomalies. Most of them may consider as process indicator and not the defect. The most common method to elimate the solder ball is to reduce the solder volume by red
Electronics Forum | Thu Mar 22 17:33:38 EST 2001 | davef
Steve, IPC TM-650 Test Methods Manual is a load. IPC TM-650 Test Methods Manual: Section 2.1 Visual Test Methods Section 2.2 Dimensional Test Methods Section 2.3 Chemical Test Methods Section 2.4 Mechanical Test Methods Section 2.5 Electrical Test M
Electronics Forum | Thu Nov 04 09:00:01 EST 2004 | russ
As stated by others you are out of IPC compliance, However, There are allowable deviations to the standard as long as the purchaser and manufacturer come to agreement that the non-conformance will not affect form fit or function. I would recommend
Electronics Forum | Sun Apr 10 06:27:50 EDT 2005 | WarpSpeed
1.) First of all: What is Your customers requirements??? 2.) If the customer or You don't have a specification; I will strongly recommend that you follow the "IPC-IPC-TM-650 Method 2.4.22 Bow & Twist" that [DaveF] suggested. 3.) If You have "critic
Electronics Forum | Mon Nov 20 19:49:03 EST 2006 | davef
Sorry for stating this incorrectly. It should been: Bow & twist for bare boards and panels: IPC-A-610 Acceptability of Electronic Assemblies, 10.6: 1.5% for PTH only and 0.75% for SMT, acording to test method TM-650, method 2.4.22 IPC-6012, par. 3.
Electronics Forum | Mon Sep 30 04:27:40 EDT 2013 | grahamcooper22
I am not sure what the IPC spec is suggesting....K type thermocouples are normally specified upto 1250 C, of course there is a tolerance in their accuracy and this probably degrades after hundreds of uses through a reflow oven, but normally the accur
Electronics Forum | Tue Apr 03 17:13:33 EDT 2007 | kmorris
Just wanted to do a poll to see how others are determining their test time for Ionic testing. Test Method IPC-TM-650 number 2.3.25, section 5.3.3, says "The test time should be in accordance with the monitoring plan criteria (set time or auto-shutof
IPC is the trade association for the printed wiring board and electronics assembly industries.
Training Provider / Events Organizer / Association / Non-Profit
3000 Lakeside Drive, 309 S
Bannockburn, IL USA
Phone: 847-615-7100
.gif)
