Electronics Forum | Mon Jun 04 10:13:48 EDT 2007 | patrickbruneel
Chris, This is probably one of the reasons medical equipment and implants are exempt from the directive. Below a quote from an article published by the medical device network. RoHS excludes medical devices (category 8) and monitoring and control i
Electronics Forum | Mon Jul 30 21:03:44 EDT 2001 | davef
You should specify the level of res based on the effect of the res on the end-use of the product. J-STD-001 defines cleanliness requirements for ALL flux types, including water soluble and no-clean that you mention. 1 There is no equivalency betwee
Electronics Forum | Sun Jun 20 06:30:49 EDT 1999 | Scott Cook
| Do anyone have any experience on assembling high frequency product, 1.8GHz or 2.4GHz. | | In our production line, we manufacture 1.8GHz product with using no clean paste (RMA type) for reflow and no clean wire for rework. In our functinal test,eit
Electronics Forum | Thu Sep 17 11:09:32 EDT 1998 | Dave F
| I need an evaluation process to prove to a customer that our no-clean process does not leave excessive residue? Any ideas? Wayne: More of the same as Chry and Justin. KEY ISSUE The first thing that you need to know is: What does your customer me
Electronics Forum | Thu Sep 17 12:00:19 EDT 1998 | Mike C
| | I need an evaluation process to prove to a customer that our no-clean process does not leave excessive residue? Any ideas? | Wayne: More of the same as Chry and Justin. | KEY ISSUE | The first thing that you need to know is: What does your cus
Electronics Forum | Mon Jun 28 10:03:22 EDT 2004 | davef
First, welcome to your new job. Second, IPC-TM-650 2.6.14 is only loosely an �Ionic Contamination (Electromigration) Test�. * Electromigration Test, IPC TM 650 2.6.14, 2.6.14.1 * Ion Chromatography for Ionic Cleanliness, IPC TM 650 2.3.28 Third, I
