Electronics Forum | Wed May 16 12:53:26 EDT 2012 | deanm
CS-400C: As with anything, once you are up on the learning curve its really not that bad. The "E" machines should be easier due to the touchscreen and the floppies are PC compatible unlike the "C" and "D". There are third party software providers tha
Electronics Forum | Mon Jan 11 04:42:38 EST 2016 | buckcho
You can do the so called "Golden Sample" with defects from the process. The making of the defects on the board is very important to be as much close to the real ones from the production. How I do it - after the printer I remove paste on some pads, so
Electronics Forum | Thu Oct 10 10:27:24 EDT 2019 | tsvetan
Omron is probably worst choice for AOI unless you have long series. Requires too much debug and there is always compromise between setting sharp criterias and get lot of fake errors or setting lose criterias and get boards with defects to pass OK. Y
Electronics Forum | Fri Mar 30 11:04:24 EST 2001 | genny
We are already using ICT on the PCB, which should catch most missing components, also components installed backwards, or the wrong value(to a point - we do RF so we have lots of very small value caps and inductors which can't be measured), and in som
Electronics Forum | Thu May 22 08:15:15 EDT 2003 | mario1304
First of all thanks to everyone who has replied, especially Pete C for his long article :-). My question is, do you have any special software to collect all the needed data? Cause data isn�t equal to information , i guess a "stupid database" (and a h
Electronics Forum | Thu May 12 04:37:30 EDT 2005 | Rob
1) Only if it's a real enhancement, and not to fix a fault in your design. 2) No, it just has to be instinctive & accurate. 3) Barcode is fine by me, but others swear by data matrix 4) Better than 1 in 10,000 - which could be once every 5 boards.
Electronics Forum | Thu May 26 15:28:41 EDT 2005 | jh0n!
It looks like there's another one or two threads somewhat similar, but allow me to pose another. We've only about two years experience in SMD production, and we're just starting to really ramp-up. As we stand right now, I'm not recieving informatio
Electronics Forum | Mon Jan 31 09:31:31 EST 2011 | dwonch
Hi all, We've had a Yestech F1 system for several years now. Overall we are happy with the machine, fast and easy to program. Good false call rate and few misses. Now for the issues. We have two in particular. 1. Software crashes - these general
Electronics Forum | Thu May 03 15:03:47 EDT 2012 | rodrigo
Hi, We got a used Mirtec MV-2HTL. I was able to sort of get it to work without any training. Their software seem well design and it did find the same errors the human inspectors were finding. But be aware that you have to register with Mirtec if you
Electronics Forum | Mon Jan 10 18:35:05 EST 2011 | eadthem
Ive used a Mirtec machine for 3 years MV3L with side angle inspection. Mirtec has some issues documentation, and repair plus. But there machine is impressive and the AOI software is good. We can find about 90-99.99% of all errors using just the 5
winsouce.jpg)