Electronics Forum: electron (Page 6450 of 7892)

Re: Rambus

Electronics Forum | Mon May 22 12:04:03 EDT 2000 | Michael Parker

80%. There are too many factors at hand to point the finger yet. We need to build a truth table and dot the i's and cross the t's before stepping up to Goliath (Samsung). Is you placement guranteed good? What x-ray have you used? Are your fab.'s know

Re: Rambus

Electronics Forum | Mon May 22 16:50:50 EDT 2000 | Kathy Palumbo

Mike, Is that greater than 80% yeilds, or less than? Here are the answers to your questions: Is you placement guranteed good? YES What x-ray have you used? Nicolet Are your fab.'s known good? YES Could you de-solder Samsung and replace with ano

Re: Rambus

Electronics Forum | Tue May 23 11:06:53 EDT 2000 | Michael Parker

Kathy- Greater than 88%. Is that 3-D Nicolet? I had a conversation with Arline yesterday, she told me about your trials and tribulations with re-balling. I would like to suggest you try micro-stencil instead. If your BGA rework center has the capabi

Re: SMT assembly on Punch/return boards

Electronics Forum | Thu May 18 20:47:14 EDT 2000 | Dave F

Ed: It might be possible, never tried tho, but if an engineer wandered in, talking about it ... Printing: Makes me pretty nervous, because punched boards are not planar, don�t stay planar, and are inconsistently not planar. If I could work-out th

Re: SMT assembly on Punch/return boards

Electronics Forum | Fri May 19 10:39:19 EDT 2000 | Boca

Ed, I workded with punch and replace fabs yeeeeears ago, major pain! Dave's right, planarity is the biggest problem, then inconsistent retention in the panel, then ANY retention in the panel. If you can get paste on them, you may be able to place

Re: SMT assembly on Punch/return boards

Electronics Forum | Fri May 19 10:41:06 EDT 2000 | Boca

Ed, I workded with punch and replace fabs yeeeeears ago, major pain! Dave's right, planarity is the biggest problem, then inconsistent retention in the panel, then ANY retention in the panel. If you can get paste on them, you may be able to place

Re: Operating a SMT system

Electronics Forum | Wed May 17 18:22:15 EDT 2000 | Earl Moon

JAX, I agree with the SMTnet, flattering myself as if you meant me as an example. I just don't agree with where it should/is going. You and Thorup are shining examples of very technically capable people offering your advice and great knowledge free

Re: Operating a SMT system

Electronics Forum | Wed May 17 18:23:19 EDT 2000 | adolfo manlangit

Janet, There's 25-minute IPC VT-91 video on Introduction to Surface Mount Rework (if available in your office) you can start with. To keep you going, you can request the dummy component catalogs from Practical Components and Topline Dummy. 'Think, th

Re: Operating a SMT system

Electronics Forum | Thu May 18 03:13:13 EDT 2000 | Earl Moon

Bait, my ass. Something so thinly vailed is what I'm talking about on this forum. However, Janet is a prime example of someone needing help and you folks kindly offered with good advice. How could you not give good advice to someone needing everythin

Re: Operating a SMT system

Electronics Forum | Thu May 18 08:32:02 EDT 2000 | Nancy V

Janet, I like Dave's advice. I would send you first to www.smtmag.com They have articles there that give the basics of SMT. Look for the button that says "Step-By-Step SMT." It will give you a touch of what your in for. Then find a good book. I


electron searches for Companies, Equipment, Machines, Suppliers & Information