Full Site - : f4g (Page 8 of 18)

Re: You choose: F4G or MCS-30

Electronics Forum | Thu Oct 14 09:01:59 EDT 1999 | Bruce

Why not to use an MCS30: Hardware is proprietary, OS-9 format, expensive to fix or replace, support, slow, RS-232 or ethernet hookup for CAD download, flat file format. F4G: PC is purchased by you, WindowsNT 4.0, inexpensive to fix or replace, supp

Re: Fuji MCS/2 vs. F4G

Electronics Forum | Wed Feb 10 02:09:07 EST 1999 | zeek

| Any thoughts from FUJI users on the likes and dislikes (pros and cons) of MCS vs. F4G , and vice versa? | | Likewise, are there any "FujiCAM" users out there who would like to comment as well? | | Thanks. | We have had some experience with both

Re: Fuji MCS/2 vs. F4G

Electronics Forum | Wed Feb 10 02:10:39 EST 1999 | zeek

| Any thoughts from FUJI users on the likes and dislikes (pros and cons) of MCS vs. F4G , and vice versa? | | Likewise, are there any "FujiCAM" users out there who would like to comment as well? | | Thanks. | We have had some experience with both

Re: Fuji MCS/2 vs. F4G

Electronics Forum | Wed Feb 10 07:01:49 EST 1999 | Joe

We use both F4G and MCS at the present and we are phasing out MCS. One main reason is that it's platform is not Y2K compliant. F4G is cumbersome and taxes a high overhead on your computer system. We have also found a bug recently when we have high

Re: You choose: F4G or MCS-30

Electronics Forum | Mon Oct 11 17:15:03 EDT 1999 | Mike H

| Just curious as to everyones thoughts on if you could chose to use F4G or an MCS-30. Which would you chose and why? | | | Larry J | |Larry, depending to your Fuji machines, if you are using any new machines like QP1 or QP2 and any other ones li

Re: Fuji MCS/2 vs. F4G

Electronics Forum | Tue Feb 16 16:25:18 EST 1999 | Tuffty

| We use both F4G and MCS at the present and we are phasing out MCS. One main reason is that it's platform is not Y2K compliant. F4G is cumbersome and taxes a high overhead on your computer system. We have also found a bug recently when we have hi

F4G network error

Electronics Forum | Thu Jul 09 12:47:09 EDT 2009 | janz

Hello, We are using F4G software for our Fuji machines. We've 5 machines plug into PC. Recently we tried to connect PC to local network but this only after while close C/C server without possibility to reopen C/C server. Reseting PC gives C/C lice

F4G Next Device goes crazy!

Electronics Forum | Tue Nov 23 00:20:10 EST 2010 | jamez

In flexa,the"Part Comment" field used for special instruct for kind of parts,it will be showed in the Report so that oprators can calrify know what to do.... i havent used MCS30&F4G,but i know machine can worked like your way well in flexa..... And i

F4G base program...

Electronics Forum | Tue Jan 31 16:31:54 EST 2012 | rodrigo

Hi all, I used to be able to set a base program when optimizing in the MCS so that the new program would have the common feeders in the same location as the original... with a few exeptions. I'm trying to do this in the F4G and it is not working. I

Another F4G/MCS30 question

Electronics Forum | Mon Jan 21 08:49:43 EST 2013 | cnotebaert

Sorry to keep brining up such old topic! I’m looking for some help. I have a CP4-3 that I’m getting up and running. It was last interfaced with Flexa software, however I’m looking at connecting an F4G or MCS30 to it. Does anyone know if it was upgrad


f4g searches for Companies, Equipment, Machines, Suppliers & Information