Electronics Forum: leaded wave solder set up (Page 9 of 65)

Re: No clean solder paste

Electronics Forum | Tue Jul 06 10:12:44 EDT 1999 | John Thorup

| | Is the no clean solder paste as good? We are wondering if we can elliminate the wash when we change from through hole to surface mount. | | | John, | | No clean is as good as your process, and the paste you are using. Everything I do is no cle

Re: Wave solder edge covers

Electronics Forum | Fri Jul 02 10:06:17 EDT 1999 | John Thorup

| | | | We are wave soldering some fabs with a lot of unmasked trace area along the edges. The trace area is solid copper covered with tin / lead, no masking, no components along the edges, same on solder side and component side (goofy board design)

Re: Wave solder edge covers

Electronics Forum | Fri Jul 02 09:54:02 EDT 1999 | John Thorup

| | | | We are wave soldering some fabs with a lot of unmasked trace area along the edges. The trace area is solid copper covered with tin / lead, no masking, no components along the edges, same on solder side and component side (goofy board design)

Re: Wave solder edge covers

Electronics Forum | Fri Jul 02 05:28:13 EDT 1999 | Vinesh gandhi

| | | We are wave soldering some fabs with a lot of unmasked trace area along the edges. The trace area is solid copper covered with tin / lead, no masking, no components along the edges, same on solder side and component side (goofy board design).

Re: Ceramic + Hi-temp solder

Electronics Forum | Thu Apr 22 14:31:39 EDT 1999 | Dave F

Michael: Two things: 1. Profile: A. Your FR4 profile will not produce good solder connections on your ceramic substrate. Hey wait a minute, you soldered FR4 at 250C?? Ceramic is a themal sponge. You'll need to play, but it should be easy compare

Re: 63/37 vs 65/35 solder

Electronics Forum | Thu Jul 29 19:30:44 EDT 1999 | Boca

| | | We are currently using a 65/35 solder for our wave process but are considering switching to a 63/37 for a substantial cost savings. No one here seems to know why we everused a 65/35 formulation in the first place. | | | I understand 63/37 to be

Blow holes on radial parts solder joints

Electronics Forum | Fri Apr 06 16:19:12 EDT 2001 | davef

We build a mixed tech [eg, QFP, SMT fly shit, DIP] board where we can't clinch the DIP. So we set the clinch and cut on the DIP to just barely clinch, leaving the leads very perpendicular to the board. I wonder if you could do something similar wit

Running with sn100c in my solder pot!

Electronics Forum | Fri Jun 09 07:26:24 EDT 2006 | amol_kane

hi, gald to hear that yr process is working well.....we are in the process of buying a wave with SN100C solder.....any pitfalls/precautions that you took during the transition? did you do any DOE for setting up the profile values?? are you seeing a

Using an AOI for TH solder checks

Electronics Forum | Tue Aug 20 08:48:07 EDT 2013 | proceng1

If the parts are hand placed and hand trimmed, why do you need to inspect whether the lead is in the hole. The operator should be inserting the part correctly. We have MIRTEC machines and they do a pixel comparison to "known good images". With a m

Re: Bottomside smt falling off in wave in only voc-free flux

Electronics Forum | Tue Jun 15 12:03:27 EDT 1999 | Dave F

| Has anyone had issues where bottomside double reflowed smt has fallen off in the wave when using voc-free flux? I have verified the hotter profile was not the issue by using an alcohol based flux with no problems.This voc-free flux is also not caus


leaded wave solder set up searches for Companies, Equipment, Machines, Suppliers & Information