Electronics Forum | Sat May 18 10:21:09 EDT 2013 | davef
isd.jww: Comments are: * Current thinking has flux volatiles being the major contributor to voiding, not scavanging by via * I have no reason to think that 0.3mm via won't gladly accept solder. Plug them, if that's a concern. * If your concern is ina
Electronics Forum | Fri Sep 08 01:08:10 EDT 2017 | tsvetan
The material is 0.12mm stainless steel, electropolished it's thick for fine pitch but we have lot of other big components on the board which do not solder good if we use 0.1mm thickness stencil. The 0.3 mm apretures are big enough and have good rele
Electronics Forum | Fri Feb 06 15:52:18 EST 2004 | pjc
SPM is superior in terms of technology and application. SPM has larger print area, up to 20� x 19", vs. 17.7� x 15.7� for the MicroFlex. MicroFlex is microprocessor controlled while the SPM has a PC. SPM can print down to 12mil (0.3mm) fine pitch no
Electronics Forum | Fri Mar 12 01:18:00 EST 1999 | Dean
| Okay, I would like to hear everyones ideas for PD naming conventions for FUJI. We are trying to use your basic names "3216_CAP" to a "MQFP208AD" But it is way out of control. Different part sizes, and vendors make it very tough to keep it all th
Electronics Forum | Tue Aug 09 11:14:28 EDT 2016 | cyber_wolf
•Rated Speed of 40,000 CPH •140 - 8mm Device Locations •14" x 18" Max PCB Size PCB dimensions Max: 457mm x 356mm Min: 80mm x 60mm Board Thickness: 0.3 to 4.0mm Component capacity Up to 140 types (8mm tape) Placing rate 0.09 sec./component - 40,
Electronics Forum | Thu Oct 26 17:48:47 EDT 2000 | Dave F
In response to your questions: 1) Suggestions on substrate material FR-4 or something better? Most PBGA are on BT. That might good for you, also. 2) Are there design guidelines for wire bonding pattern on the substrate? Several things: 1 Doesn�t
Electronics Forum | Wed Aug 21 17:50:05 EDT 2002 | davef
First, it�s GREAT that your defect rate of 282 is very close to your Boss� goal of 50 ppm. Second, your Cpk and your ppm numbers don�t tie out with our expectations. You say Cpk for: * mounter is 1.0 and �your mounting is 83ppm�. * printing is 1.33
Electronics Forum | Mon Sep 21 22:25:05 EDT 2009 | davef
What babies!!!! Sure, give it a try. * Stencil material: metal or plastic, no difference in print, metal is easier to clean, no static problem, available * Stencil thickness: Chips 0.006", SOIC 0.010" [print height equals 1/3 thickness] * For 0603, a
Electronics Forum | Fri Oct 09 06:32:38 EDT 2009 | davef
Here's what is on that post referred to, not sure what you need more than ... "* Stencil material: metal or plastic, no difference in print, metal is easier to clean, no static problem, available * Stencil thickness: Chips 0.006", SOIC 0.010" [print
Electronics Forum | Tue Nov 03 11:46:52 EST 2009 | davef
Search the finee SMTnet Archives for previous posts on the topic. Here's a clip from on of those posts that may get you started. [snip] * Stencil material: metal or plastic, no difference in print, metal is easier to clean, no static problem, availa
