| | | Hi All, | | | Any one experince BGA-chipset warp about 10-15mil after removing | | | from PCB? | | | FYI, the rework temperature for preheat was 170C from room | | | temperature about 30 seconds, & BGA was removed at temperature | | | between 190-200C. | | | Thankyou. | | | | | | BRs, | | | Robert | | | | | Could it be a moisture problem (PBGA) ? | | | | Wolfgang | | | Hi , Wolfgang, | Might be moisture problem , are you suggesting that the PCB | must go for baking before BGA being removed ? If yes, what's | the baking condition. | | Robert | | | | Hi Robert, due to the fact that PBGAs are known as moisture sensitive devices there�s a handling procedure recommended for rework also. As I said a couple of days ago in another thread concerning BGA there�s a hint on the motorola-page http://mot-sps.com/solutions/wired/pbga/rework.html
Here an excerpt: "If the assembled board has been exposed to "out of dry-pack" conditions for an extended period of time (24 to 96 or more hours, depending on PBGA configuration and ambient conditions) and removal is performed, "popcorning"--or die attach delamination--will occur. To avoid this, the entire assembly must be baked at 125�C for 12 hours. Since the saturation/ bake-out curves for PBGA are quite steep, baking for half to two-thirds of this time will go a long way in preventing popcorning, as long as care is taken not to use an excessive ramp-up rate (>3�C/min) or maximum temperature (~240-250�C)."
For the correct handling of moisture sensitive devices and prebaking advices see IPC-SM-786A or newer publikations. I encountered the following: A tray of sample BGAs was send to me proper packed and sealed, we opened it and the parts looked perfect ( no warpage), doing soldering tests, showing samples around etc. the tray stayed open for a couple of weeks. After that I wanted to show the good coplanarity of this devices but, surprise surprise, they looked like tiny salatbowls. Haven�t done baking those more use them as bad samples. For baking I go with the recomendations made in the IPC. In your case I guess you are gonna reuse these removed components if not why not bother about something that appears strange.
Good luck Wolfgang
reply »