| | I would like to invite everyone to share/discuss | | information/knowledge/experience they have with | | the req's that are assumed to be valid for the | | temperature/time relation in the process of reflow | | soldering Pin In Paste, Intrusive Reflow or whatever | | you want to call it. | | The reason for posting this invitation is that papers | | on the subject rarely discuss the thermal req's while | | many people (in practice) are in doubt or unaware of | | what is really essential. | | Frank J. de Klein | Frank, | What are you folks over at Dover-Soltec looking for? Most of todays ovens, at least those used by the larger contractors, have the "oomph" to adequately run a paste-in-hole process. For those of you out there who want to verify this, solder a thermocouple to a leg of your candidate for paste in hole and obtain a profile. It's a great indicator / verification tool. | Best Regards, | Justin Medernach | Flextronics International
As one of the news guys on the block I am interested in paste-in-hole process, which I assume is for soldering through hole components in the reflow oven, because every time I even hint about looking into it here, the old guard gives me all the reasons that the process can't work; incomplete wetting; the solder all wets to the hole and not the pin or the other way around; it is difficult to get sufficient volume for thick boards; if you have sufficient volume it does not wick paste the heavy internal ground and power layers; it is difficult or impossible to inspect solder joints to verify sufficient paste volume; it goes on. I get the same response if I mention solder preforms. From the number of companies selling preforms and solder dispensers I have to assume that somebody is getting the process to work. So I would appreciate guidence not only concerning heat and temperature requirements but process in general. Since I run an older vapor phase oven I don't have a lot of control over profiles, My reflow temperature is my vapor temp. Thanks for the opertunity to expand vent a little frustration Gary
reply »