Electronics Forum | Thu May 24 12:56:31 EDT 2007 | adlsmt
Im sure you will get some better responses but here is a start. We went from UP2000 to UP3000 Ultraflex about 2 years ago. The UP-2000 uses tooling nests and UP-3000 Ultraflex does not. Makes a huge difference in setup time. Up-3000 is BIG. I think t
Electronics Forum | Mon Jul 29 14:57:18 EDT 2002 | pjc
Hi VMS, I think if any model it would be the one they sell the most to the Asia market, which is the UltraPrint 2000. By the way, the UP3000 is called the UltraFlex 3000 this week. The UF3K is the top-of-the-range machine, top $$$$.
Electronics Forum | Fri Oct 29 15:29:56 EDT 2004 | jasont
Hi Ran, Have you considered 2nd hand screen printers? We are an SMT equipment re-seller but also operate a subsidary CM factory in SuZhou, China . We use Dek 265 LT and MPM AP screen printers in our SuZhou factory and have the following in stock f
Electronics Forum | Fri Oct 03 08:42:36 EDT 2003 | m4040
This is probably the most advanced machine that MPM has EVER offered. It operates in a Windows 2000 environment, which means plug and play networking. Both setup for new boards and 2D are VERY easy to set up. Most new board programming can be done of
Electronics Forum | Sat Jul 16 18:40:12 EDT 2016 | aemery
As an MPM guy and would choose.....MPM, surprise! Of the legacy models the UP2000 seems to be the favor among most of my clients. Newer models like the Accuflex's and Accela/Momentims are great, but as far as the old stuff the UP2K's are the favorit
Electronics Forum | Wed Sep 30 05:10:28 EDT 2015 | aemery
SWAG does make a good point. The tool he is talking about is located on setup page 1 in the vision box and is labeled FP Mode (Fine Pitch) mode. BY default the setting is "0" this means that once the machine is put into auto mode the camera or visio
Electronics Forum | Thu Feb 15 13:46:16 EST 2018 | aemery
Griinder, Maybe it's me, but I think what you might be saying here is that you see a reflected image of the PCB or Stencil when you and teaching the fiducials and it is interfering with the teaching routine, is that correct? If this is true it is c
| 1 |
