Electronics Forum | Wed Dec 05 20:58:21 EST 2012 | davef
Look here IPC-TM-650 2.3.25 [http://www.ipc.org/4.0_Knowledge/4.1_Standards/test/2-3_2-3-25-1.pdf ]
Electronics Forum | Tue Sep 25 17:42:11 EDT 2007 | gsala
your comments will be appreciated, please; IC tests have been performed on two kind of Raw PCBs (HASL) samples by adopting three different methods : First Sample (supllier A) - Omegameter 600 SMT, solvent=40�C: extratcing time 10 min result = 0.2
Electronics Forum | Tue Sep 25 20:33:02 EDT 2007 | davef
We vote for: IPC-TM-650 2.3.25.1, solvent: 80�C, extract time: 60 minutes, hold time: 30 minutes or until room temperature. Listen, it really doesn't matter which method you decide to use. IPC-TM-650 2.3.25 is a process control method. It's more imp
Electronics Forum | Fri Oct 08 11:51:10 EDT 2004 | blnorman
Since you are using an Ionograph you need to use IPC-TM-650 method 2.3.25, static method. The test method is free on the IPC website. You'll need to get your customer to give you an acceptable cleanliness level to test to.
Electronics Forum | Thu Nov 20 04:00:36 EST 2008 | caerleon
Our sub-contractors will be using SMD600. Thankyou all for your replies much appriciated.
Electronics Forum | Mon Nov 02 22:04:30 EST 2015 | davef
An ionic contamination tester should meet industrial cleanliness specifications including MIL-STD-2000A, MIL-P-28809, J-STD-001 and Resistivity of Solvent Extract (ROSE) Test Method IPC-TM-650 2.3.25
Electronics Forum | Tue Feb 22 02:51:25 EST 2022 | davef
The industry standard for Resistivity of Solvent Extract (ROSE) Testing analysis is IPC-TM-650 Method 2.3.25 – Detection and Measurement of Ionizable Surface Contaminants by Resistivity of Solvent Extract (ROSE).
Electronics Forum | Mon May 13 11:05:49 EDT 2013 | shankar2013
I have moved the MOT cards. The messages are still the same. Booster +25V is stable, The BM3 +25V indicator shows no +25V which means any of the feeds down the chain pulled it down. So basically once it is low the relays in the BM3 card will not latc
Electronics Forum | Tue Apr 03 17:13:33 EDT 2007 | kmorris
Just wanted to do a poll to see how others are determining their test time for Ionic testing. Test Method IPC-TM-650 number 2.3.25, section 5.3.3, says "The test time should be in accordance with the monitoring plan criteria (set time or auto-shutof
Electronics Forum | Thu Feb 05 18:16:37 EST 2009 | adamcrum
Can somebody help me to understand what standards are in place for deinozed water for cleaning circuit boards. I know they are supposed to be in acordance with J-STD-001D, but what does that entail? All I can find on the internet is that J-STD-001D a