Electronics Forum | Mon Apr 09 21:09:29 EDT 2012 | isd_jwendell
I haven't worked with anything as small as 01005s, but something you didn't mention is the %metal of your paste. I just switch from 90% to 89.5% (AIM NC257-2) and could tell the difference. Just an idea...
Electronics Forum | Wed Sep 26 11:17:38 EDT 2012 | garym4569
We have been having a solder paste reflow issue which results in the solder not wetting to the LED lead. The solder appears to create "puddles" on the pcb pad. I have attached AOI image for review. We have had the pads analyzed for contamination, w
Electronics Forum | Fri Apr 04 18:16:43 EDT 2014 | garym4569
We are in the process of launching a new product and found reflow solder issue with one of the inductors. I have set oven profile to paste specifications. I just finished profiling with thermocouple under problem component. All other components ex
Electronics Forum | Sun May 13 02:08:26 EDT 2012 | isd_jwendell
In testing 63/37 SnPb NC paste I have seen HUGE differences in performance. Have you tried a different paste? I prefer AIM (NC257-2), they have performed well in each round of testing. My observations regarding mixing old and new paste: The paste ha
Electronics Forum | Fri Mar 23 10:00:38 EDT 2012 | isd_jwendell
I am a big fan of AIM SnPb solder paste. I currently use NC257-2 (no-clean, 89.5%), and recommend you include it in your evaluations.
Electronics Forum | Fri Apr 17 09:39:07 EDT 2009 | rkevin
I received my sample jar of NC257-2 SAC305 from Aim, and while that may have been true about older Aim paste formulations, this stuff prints and reflows better than anything I have tried and more importantly there were practically no voids on a 256 B
| 1 |
.gif)
