Electronics Forum | Sat Jun 05 08:18:03 EDT 2004 | vinitverma
Hi Grant, If you're really looking for speed, I'm sure you're looking for another machine for doing the QFPs, BGAs stuff etc. In that even, why not have a look at the long proven Assembleon FCM machine!! It is a totally different concept with UNMATC
Electronics Forum | Thu Dec 16 01:30:33 EST 2004 | vinitverma
I respect your statements about the FCM-I but only partially. Yes it was meant for ONLY HIGH VOLUMES, but in those cases, it has proved to be a masterpeice. Talk to those who've used the machines for 70000 hours or so. I have customers here that're u
Electronics Forum | Sun Oct 24 20:55:45 EDT 2004 | christina
Dear Chris Thank you so much for the prompt reply and it really helps. Do you have any SMT experience for rig-flex boards? Can you share with me about the differences with that of rigid boards? Is there any special precaution needed? When you were d
Electronics Forum | Wed Nov 18 17:18:59 EST 1998 | Tom
| My company is now using Fuji SMT machine, and is now considering to purchase QP132. Appreciate if sone one let me know about QP132's capability, relaiability and atability on the production. And what is advantages conpared to Philips FCM. | |Other
Electronics Forum | Thu Aug 13 14:53:17 EDT 1998 | Timm
| | | | I am considering of Philips FCM for the next production. | | | | But I have heard a rumour saying this machine is not capable for checking the lead polarity due to the laser scan system. | | | | i.e. SOT might be populated in wrong direction.
Electronics Forum | Thu Jul 23 15:19:52 EDT 1998 | Timm
| | I am considering of Philips FCM for the next production. | | But I have heard a rumour saying this machine is not capable for checking the lead polarity due to the laser scan system. | | i.e. SOT might be populated in wrong direction. | | Can som
Electronics Forum | Mon Jul 27 23:20:14 EDT 1998 | Vincent Robert
| | I am considering of Philips FCM for the next production. | | But I have heard a rumour saying this machine is not capable for checking the lead polarity due to the laser scan system. | | i.e. SOT might be populated in wrong direction. | | Can som
Electronics Forum | Fri Jul 24 12:53:30 EDT 1998 | Brad Kendall
| | | I am considering of Philips FCM for the next production. | | | But I have heard a rumour saying this machine is not capable for checking the lead polarity due to the laser scan system. | | | i.e. SOT might be populated in wrong direction. | | |
Electronics Forum | Mon Jul 27 12:43:19 EDT 1998 | Adrian
| | | | I am considering of Philips FCM for the next production. | | | | But I have heard a rumour saying this machine is not capable for checking the lead polarity due to the laser scan system. | | | | i.e. SOT might be populated in wrong direction.
Electronics Forum | Fri Oct 22 11:53:53 EDT 2004 | C Lampron
Hi Christina, What would you be basing the yields off of? Is it solder defect, component placement, etc....? I have worked for a flex house for quite a few years. You are right. The Polyimide is very dimentionally unstable. (even more so on humid da
winsouce.jpg)
.gif)
