Electronics Forum | Thu Sep 19 21:46:01 EDT 2002 | scottefiske
In the past year I was responsible for developing and leading a Team focused on AOI, Evaluation, Justification, and with a full ROI required, supporting a HMLV manufacturing environment. If you have in these economic times the additional resources t
Electronics Forum | Tue Nov 06 06:23:31 EST 2007 | clampron
Good Morning Roger, The Mirtec's can be adjusted to lower your false call rate. This can be done by reducing the matching percentage for each componnent but the result of this action is that the machine becomes less selective. If you lower them too
Electronics Forum | Mon Apr 24 15:11:11 EDT 2006 | pjc
For solder joint inspection you cannot beat AXI. That's what is was designed for. AOI machines were designed for component inspections and solder joint checking was an add-on. In transmission AXI you can get a measurement of the whole solder joint. A
Electronics Forum | Fri Apr 21 18:43:23 EDT 2006 | SD
Sorry, I have not read the article. However, I do have five years experience constantly tweaking an AOI system that ran ONE product! The strength of the machine was solder inspection. The biggest problem was component color variation and shadowing
Electronics Forum | Wed Jun 19 15:28:58 EDT 2024 | davidk
Hi Tom, Thank you for your comment 75% FPY is also our target, cause we gonna have the AOIs in the SMT line. So you would expect more opportunities? I didn´t notice but there are not so many components with high opportunity rate. (the average numbe
Electronics Forum | Fri Jun 07 14:05:39 EDT 2024 | davidk
I wanted to open a discussion and ask about opinion: What is a normal result of the inspection of an AOI? How many falls calls per component /opportunity is bad/normal/good? How many defects per component/opportunity is bad/normal/good? What is goo
Electronics Forum | Wed Jul 16 14:13:17 EDT 2014 | alexeis
Hi, If you can not rely on your programmer and the tools he uses then "double checking" can save you only materials but in time you really do not save often extend meaning. There are things you can identify before the stove, but if you use tools li
Electronics Forum | Thu Jun 13 14:41:40 EDT 2024 | tommy_magyar
Hi David, In one of my previous jobs I worked as an AOI/AXI process engineer and we had a set target of 75% FPY. This means that 75% of the boards at IPC Class 3 standards would not have a single false call. This also means you would need to set y
Electronics Forum | Thu Jul 17 17:36:28 EDT 2014 | proy
Hi, > > If you can not rely on your programmer and > the tools he uses then "double checking" can save > you only materials but in time you really do not > save often extend meaning. There are things you > can identify before the stove, but if
Electronics Forum | Thu Dec 16 15:06:32 EST 2010 | rway
I would go with AOI. Reasons are: --AOIs are faster --They have more coverage. Given, you cannot test the value of components, but the AOI will ensure that all resistors are correct, orientation of ICs are proper and components are present on the