Electronics Forum | Tue Jun 27 08:38:03 EDT 2006 | cuculi54986@yahoo.com
I tried some SN100C from AIM... On only one array. It flowed well on the chips but did not like the finish on the SOT23's on the board. I did not have enough arrays to mess around, so we switched it over to SAC305 and had no issues. I'm guessing w
Electronics Forum | Thu Jan 19 23:29:29 EST 2006 | theSaint
I've seen many comments in many threads about the positive attributes of SN100C (apparently mostly by salesmen). However, I have a concern for the higher temps that will be encountered when using SN100C (or Sn/Cu) vs. SAC305 (vs. 63/37), specifica
Electronics Forum | Thu Mar 22 03:02:02 EDT 2012 | kcngoi
We use succesfully SN100C on ERSA330 for about > 2-3years. > > Pros: > > - price, - less dross > comparing to SAC305, - some ppl say better > mechanical durability comparing to SAC305 > (depends who pay for "independent" > studies) > > Cons:
Electronics Forum | Mon Feb 27 09:43:42 EST 2012 | andrzej
We use succesfully SN100C on ERSA330 for about 2-3years. Pros: - price, - less dross comparing to SAC305, - some ppl say better mechanical durability comparing to SAC305 (depends who pay for "independent" studies) Cons: - higher melting temp so r
Electronics Forum | Thu Dec 29 22:19:36 EST 2005 | Joseph
We have tested SN100C for LF wave soldering process since August'05 and currently start production for a month ago. Initially we use SAC305, but due to the shrinkage cavities (micro-crack) we changeover to SN100C. In summary, SN100C did perform well
Electronics Forum | Wed Jan 11 18:44:42 EST 2006 | fctassembly
Hello Greg, Glad to hear your success with the SACX0307 copy. By the way, does the P mean it contains phosphorus? Does yours also contain bismuth like the SACX0307 (according to their plumbing solder patent for X0307)? In response to your discussion
Electronics Forum | Wed Sep 04 07:15:02 EDT 2013 | anilw2006
We have using SAC305 type solder paste for lead free process. One sample paste received of SN100C.After reflow SN100C type paste joint looks brighter and good compare to SAC305. Please help me which paste is good for smt process?
Electronics Forum | Mon Jan 23 19:48:27 EST 2012 | gaz
This make me curious how many people are using sn100 versus how many using sac305. The sn100 seemed to generally cover the pads and flow a little better, and looked nicer, but SAC305 overall was easier. Is this normal or do I need to work more on sa
Electronics Forum | Thu Feb 15 10:48:34 EST 2007 | ck_the_flip
Is there anybody out there doing this scenario: SAC 305 Reflow & SN100C Wave and Selective Can the 2 alloys be mixed on 1 board, say, SAC 305 for SMT, and SN100C for thru-hole? Are 2 different rework chemistries needed, or can one use SN100c wire
Electronics Forum | Fri Mar 03 13:44:36 EST 2006 | Jon Provost
We switched to Sn100C on 2 waves and kept one with SAC305. The SAC305 will be converted to SN100C as soon as the Aim rep. delivers it next week.
