Electronics Forum | Fri Nov 08 10:06:24 EST 2013 | zrunkle_api
I have a small resistor pack that I need to place(EXB-N8V510JX). It has Concave terminals not sure how with any of our equipment how to make a terminal with a half circle cut into it. Any help would be great.
Electronics Forum | Wed Nov 13 09:27:42 EST 2013 | zrunkle_api
Thanks I will give that a Try.
Electronics Forum | Mon Mar 21 12:02:09 EST 2005 | Rob
Hi Colin, Are you using the 1206 package with 4 elements or one of the higher density smaller packages? With the first type you can get them in both Convex or Concave terminations, with most of the solderability problems associated with using the C
Electronics Forum | Mon Nov 11 02:03:06 EST 2013 | dman97
Use fuji vision #12. That is for the resistor network types. You cant inspect the individual leads. Vision type 12 tell the CP that this is a rectangular chip with terminals. You don't need to define the leads in the PD just the overall shape of th
Electronics Forum | Tue Mar 22 06:09:20 EST 2005 | blueflag
The size is 1206 approx with concave terminals and we are using 1 to 1 appertures on 5thou screen Thanks for reply
Electronics Forum | Fri Nov 08 12:27:46 EST 2013 | zrunkle_api
That is what I'm currently doing. But we are getting errors with placement. I would like to insp. the lead them self.
Electronics Forum | Wed Nov 13 09:22:03 EST 2013 | swag
We run these all the time. Agree with other posts. I tried a few times to read leads on these with mixed results. Leadless is best. On GSM - run as leadless or chip and crank the lighting up on 2.6 or 4.0 ULC. You should get good centering.
Electronics Forum | Wed Nov 13 14:55:42 EST 2013 | jimmyboz
The CP4 will place them all day with no rejections. If they are small target the CP4, if they are large, select the GSM.
Electronics Forum | Thu Nov 14 17:22:47 EST 2013 | dman97
Yes CP4 with vision type 12 will place these no problem. I am even putting these down on an old CP3 with no problems.
Electronics Forum | Fri Nov 15 09:59:42 EST 2013 | zrunkle_api
When I used the 12 code I saw worse placement then with the 254 that I used in the past. So far my best and most consistent results came for the GSM with only looking at the outside edges of the part. Thanks again for everyone’s help.
