Electronics Forum | Fri Nov 08 09:24:16 EST 2002 | rspoerri
Hi, I'm setting up an new production line for cell phone manufacturing and am looking for a second printer for the back half of the line. I am looking at both new and used though used is looking pretty attractive due to the glut of equipment curren
Electronics Forum | Tue Jul 30 12:30:21 EDT 2013 | JB
We are breaking a 1995 Dek 265GS screen printer for spares, it has the blue under screen cleaner, green 2D inspection camera. Was in full working order before getting a new Dek printer installed. The reason for replacing it was the air line pipes had
Electronics Forum | Thu Oct 05 21:14:08 EDT 2006 | chrisgriffin
I'm with Chunks on this. In my experience MPM's are very accurate and reliable. There are so many out there because people like them. You can make a program with 2D inspection in about 10 minutes. Things do sometimes break on the 3000's, but not
Electronics Forum | Fri Dec 28 17:44:41 EST 2007 | flipit
Back in the mid 90s I used an SVS 3D solder paste inspection system. We used it as a stand along unit but it was an inline model. We would bring printed PCBs off the Dek 265 solder printers and check every 5 or 10 printed panels. They almost alway
Electronics Forum | Fri May 26 02:22:18 EDT 2000 | Sal
Generally a good and safe option when selecting a printer, A rhobust machine with good process capabilities. We print anything from 0402's to CCGA's using proflow, as well as print adhesive with no problems. The 265 ranges from the MK1 TO Infinity mo
Electronics Forum | Mon Oct 09 14:30:44 EDT 2006 | Brian
I agree with Chunks. Programming was much simpler. The 2D inspection is much better on MPM. I didn't have to use offsets on the MPM or the DEK very often, but did more on teh DEK. I didn't like the front justified stencils on the DEK. I also did
Electronics Forum | Thu Oct 05 16:45:19 EDT 2006 | realchunks
Wow, I'd have to say the exact opposite. Compared to MPM the DEKs were WAY longer to program. But find out for yourself CN. Program each and get back to us. Don't forget to program in 2D as well. That will be the kicker! As for spending money,
| 1 |
