Electronics Forum | Fri Mar 23 02:33:44 EDT 2012 | vinitverma
Their reply is correct. In FCM II and FCM Multiflex there is NO possibility to enable the pusher.
Electronics Forum | Mon Aug 02 04:29:42 EDT 2004 | vinitverma
Hi Grant, You can visit http://www.assembleon.com and look at the videos of the A-series as also the FCM multiflex. If you need more info., just write to me at vinit.verma@prosemtechnology.com Hope you find this equipment interesting - you'll be am
Electronics Forum | Fri May 03 01:25:33 EDT 2002 | gerits
Dear Sir, I do not want to mix in this "subjective" discussion but as an employee of Assembl�on (buider of FCM II, FCM multiflex 50, 75, 100) I can provide you with MTTR, MTBF, placement data (0201), software, and other (also customer) data on our e
Electronics Forum | Fri Dec 17 11:06:44 EST 2004 | Base
Sorry Rob, FCM-1: first machines around 1990 FCM-2: first machines around 1996 FCM Multiflex: I think it was 2001? AX: about 1.5 years now But indeed, let's finish it: the entire discussion drifted a bit away from the initial question. I just get a
Electronics Forum | Thu Dec 16 01:30:33 EST 2004 | vinitverma
I respect your statements about the FCM-I but only partially. Yes it was meant for ONLY HIGH VOLUMES, but in those cases, it has proved to be a masterpeice. Talk to those who've used the machines for 70000 hours or so. I have customers here that're u
Electronics Forum | Sat Jun 05 08:18:03 EDT 2004 | vinitverma
Hi Grant, If you're really looking for speed, I'm sure you're looking for another machine for doing the QFPs, BGAs stuff etc. In that even, why not have a look at the long proven Assembleon FCM machine!! It is a totally different concept with UNMATC
| 1 |
