Electronics Forum | Tue Feb 12 14:20:54 EST 2002 | BLN
Thanks Dave, as always you're a overflowing fount of information.
Electronics Forum | Tue Feb 12 09:29:59 EST 2002 | BLN
I'm revising a PC board spec and Mil-P-13949 is called out in the previous rev. This spec has been cancelled and as such should not be called out in the revision (if you call out a cancelled spec in another spec, the supplier can't be held to the re
Electronics Forum | Tue Feb 12 10:33:45 EST 2002 | davef
IPC-4101 - Specification For Base Materials For Rigid And Multilayer Boards replaces MIL-P-13949 - Plastic Sheet, Laminated, Copper-Clad (For Printed Wiring) Taking a broader look, there are many �Obsolete MIL Document To Commercial Document� replac
Electronics Forum | Wed May 28 08:25:08 EDT 2003 | davef
That's what we do [no more than three reworks or mods]. Your "four reworks permissable" was probably based on the 55110 five thermal cycles, counting wave soldering as the first cycle. How do you plan to keep track of each of those rework actions?
Electronics Forum | Wed Mar 03 17:09:55 EST 1999 | Tom Reilly
We have recently had problems with bare boards coming in too thick. I would like to know how to properly specify the minimum and maximum thickness using the 13949F and IPC 4101 specs. (We currently use "MATERIAL: GFN 0620 C1/C1 A2A per MIL - P - 1394
Electronics Forum | Wed Mar 03 20:20:30 EST 1999 | Earl Moon
| We have recently had problems with bare boards coming in too thick. I would like to know how to properly specify the minimum and maximum thickness using the 13949F and IPC 4101 specs. (We currently use "MATERIAL: GFN 0620 C1/C1 A2A per MIL - P - 13
Electronics Forum | Sun Aug 08 11:15:32 EDT 1999 | Earl Moon
| | Mike, | | | | Got your message and those of others concerning PCB fab supplier evaluation and qualification check lists, etc. I have a severe problem here in WI as I can hardly access the internet, and when I do it is cut off abruptly for no goo
| 1 |
.gif)
