Electronics Forum | Mon May 22 10:41:50 EDT 2000 | Scott G
Can anybody provide information on shear testing of passive components. What standards are used etc. Thanks
Electronics Forum | Tue May 23 20:39:37 EDT 2000 | Dave F
Scott: Sounds like fun: � Solder joint strength in pull/shear varies with lead geometry, solder volume, lead metal/metallization, and the test method. � Among things, IPC-TM-650 talks to getting pads off-of boards. For instance: Method 2.4.8 is for
Electronics Forum | Fri May 17 16:53:50 EDT 2002 | davef
I recall a couple of papers in the SMTA 'Knowledgebase' that used ball shearing and an element in a study that compared BGA [maybe uBGA] component fabrication methods, er sumpin.
Electronics Forum | Fri Mar 30 13:06:50 EST 2001 | aortiz
Hi, I need support on the method or applicable standard to measure the shear force strength on chip capacitors and resistors. I know the soldered joints strength is related to land desing, solder volume, pcb and component solderability, component
Electronics Forum | Fri Mar 30 20:06:55 EST 2001 | aortiz
Maybe there's no test and I don't know where or why my customer came with that requirement (I think because in one of the board shipments he got a board were a smd resistor broke, but I think that happened because miss handling), but anyway I need so
Electronics Forum | Wed Jul 03 15:40:17 EDT 2013 | davef
Shear tests are [in my opinion] senseless. The shear stress you measure depends more on the shear rate and on the point where the force is applied than on the grain structure. When shearing a component, you not only apply shear stress, but also roll
Electronics Forum | Wed Jan 04 12:48:34 EST 2006 | pjc
In-Circuit Test is the best method for ensuring solder joint connections. It is a much more reliable than AOI. An ICT machine can ensure solder connections are made for array package devices such as BGA, PGA, etc... AOI is best for component I.D.- is
Electronics Forum | Mon Oct 25 21:49:14 EDT 2004 | davef
First, any results of pull or shear tests are unscientific at best. [We pop our BGA from boards with, appropriately enough, a beverage can opener.] Second, we have no have problems with your ENIG specification. Third, as with your customer, we'd e
Electronics Forum | Tue Aug 26 17:50:52 EDT 2014 | dkrawchuk
Hi, We have some boards that we apply an underfill to a BGA. Some boards have underfill that covered the surrounding passives. The customer is concerned that the different expansion rates will damage the passives. Does anyone know of a company th
Electronics Forum | Fri Aug 08 12:46:02 EDT 2003 | davef
When I was a salty old fart in the Navy, we sent the babes from the turnip patch off on snipe hunts. Shear tests are [in my opinion] senseless. The shear stress you measure depends more on the shear rate and on the point where the force is applied
