Electronics Forum | Thu May 06 10:28:27 EDT 2004 | Bryan She
Modify your stencil aperture shape...reduce the solder paste deposited on pad,will reduce the solder balls.Be sure your reflow profile are good before doing this.rising slope is very important. This is my opinion.thanks. Bryan
Electronics Forum | Wed Feb 07 16:14:54 EST 2001 | Antonio
I've recently read a posting here which said that the person was trying to reduce solder balls. One of the things the person had done was to adjust the reflow profile so as to be hotter and longer in the reflow state. Am I wrong here? I thought th
Electronics Forum | Thu Jul 05 10:45:01 EDT 2001 | dougie
Steven, There is a load of info on this if you check through the archives. Quick pointer though are: Solder balls are caused by paste creeping under the component at placement. The part is placed and the paste is squashed under the component, when t
Electronics Forum | Mon Jul 16 14:48:16 EDT 2001 | mparker
Just received "Circuits Assembly", July 2001 issue. An article regarding solder balls and aperture design, beginning on page 40. This DOE had aperture, reflow profile and no clean pastes (3 types) as attributes. It is advocated that a U-shaped a
Electronics Forum | Mon Jul 27 13:59:11 EDT 1998 | Robert Steltman
We are about to run our first BGA devices and would appreciate some confirmation on a few points. First some details: PCB & Device: ============= 1) 16 layer (4 power, 4 gnd, 8 signal) 2) gold on nickel finish 3) ceramic BGA with eutectic balls Refl
Electronics Forum | Tue Jul 28 02:22:59 EDT 1998 | Bob Willis
Here is what I would do faced with your problem. First I would profile a similar board or use an existing profile. From there I would place the dummy device on the surface of a sample board with a thin thermocouple soldered to the board surface under
Electronics Forum | Tue Jul 28 02:13:57 EDT 1998 | Bob Willis
There is a procedure for profiling on my web site that may be of use to start with www.bobwillis.co.uk | We are about to run our first BGA devices and would appreciate some confirmation on a few points. | First some details: | PCB & Device: | ======
Electronics Forum | Tue Jul 28 17:23:58 EDT 1998 | Robert Steltman
| | We are about to run our first BGA devices and would appreciate some confirmation on a few points. | | First some details: | | PCB & Device: | | ============= | | 1) 16 layer (4 power, 4 gnd, 8 signal) | | 2) gold on nickel finish | | 3) ceramic
Electronics Forum | Tue Jul 28 09:15:49 EDT 1998 | Justin Medernach
| We are about to run our first BGA devices and would appreciate some confirmation on a few points. | First some details: | PCB & Device: | ============= | 1) 16 layer (4 power, 4 gnd, 8 signal) | 2) gold on nickel finish | 3) ceramic BGA with eutec
Electronics Forum | Fri Sep 21 11:02:37 EDT 2001 | davef
You can measure temperatures any place that you would like, but the issue is the temperature of the solder. We've seen solder temperatures that vary from lead to lead on the same component. Why don't you want to measure the temperature of your so
winsouce.jpg)
