Electronics Forum | Tue Jun 27 08:38:03 EDT 2006 | cuculi54986@yahoo.com
I tried some SN100C from AIM... On only one array. It flowed well on the chips but did not like the finish on the SOT23's on the board. I did not have enough arrays to mess around, so we switched it over to SAC305 and had no issues. I'm guessing w
Electronics Forum | Sat Apr 21 14:50:17 EDT 2012 | edmentzer
We are using SN100C in both our wave and selective machines and have very good results. We also using it for ROHS hand soldering. It flows better than SAC305, the joints are shinny just like Sn63/37. We are looking into using SN100C as our paste b
Electronics Forum | Fri May 04 08:37:45 EDT 2012 | waveroom
SN100C is being used by 95% of our customers over the SAC305. The main reasons are Cost big savings easily $10.00 lb, nice shiny solder joints good for quality inspection. Very few people are using SN100C in SMT Due to increased temperature requireme
Electronics Forum | Wed Apr 18 10:05:24 EDT 2012 | dyoungquist
We started with SN100C from the very beginning when we purchased our selective solder machine. It has been working well for us. I can't speak to what happens when changing over to it, but I've heard of many companies using SN100C for selective sold
Electronics Forum | Fri Mar 03 13:44:36 EST 2006 | Jon Provost
We switched to Sn100C on 2 waves and kept one with SAC305. The SAC305 will be converted to SN100C as soon as the Aim rep. delivers it next week.
Electronics Forum | Thu Feb 15 14:10:59 EST 2007 | Cmiller
Russ is correct. We have been using SAC 305 for SMT and SN100C for wave and selective and repair for about a year. May switch to SN100C in SMT at some point if we can get some paste that wets better.
Electronics Forum | Thu Dec 29 09:20:30 EST 2005 | Cmiller
We have tested SN100C and SAC305 in our selective solder machine (Ersa Versaflow). We wanted to test both alloys in the selective first because the investment in filling the pots is minimal. In our initial tests the SN100C alloy appears to be the bes
Electronics Forum | Fri Jan 20 09:58:48 EST 2006 | adlsmt
We are using SAC for reflow because of the lower temp and better wetting and copper disolution is not so much an issue in reflow. There is not much difference in the alloys and they can be mixed with no problems. I assume any supplier of SN100C cou
Electronics Forum | Thu Apr 06 17:42:59 EDT 2006 | GS
found this interesting comparison (SAC305 SN100C) http://www.nihonsuperior.co.jp/english/data/pdf/nse2_1.pdf Regards..........GS
Electronics Forum | Fri May 19 13:40:36 EDT 2006 | grantp
Hi, Sorry to drag this thread up again, but we were recommended to change the wave to SAC305, but is everyone recommending SN100C? That seems to be the feeling on this thread. What flux is used? Regards, Grant
