Electronics Forum | Thu Dec 05 08:49:43 EST 2002 | pjc
Yamaha YV100Xg is the Topaz XII YV100X is Topaz X YV100II is Topaz YV88Xg is Emerald XII YV88X is Emerald X YVL88II is Emerald YV180Xg is Sapphire XII
Electronics Forum | Thu Aug 26 20:35:33 EDT 2021 | kumarb
Hi. Have the Emerald-X (Yamaha YV88X) unit. Works fine. Using F9 (Teach & Trace), we can position to most locations on the front feeders (not to the extreme left or extreme right due to the head design). Should the unit be able to do the same for t
Electronics Forum | Tue Jun 22 06:53:31 EDT 2021 | vinitverma
Change Feeder position from 'Automatic' to 'Relative'. And enter the feeder location of whatever rear feeder you want it to be at. Optimisation won't move it then.
Electronics Forum | Thu Jun 24 10:03:18 EDT 2021 | joost
i did not know that! i learned something today, thank you.
Electronics Forum | Wed Aug 24 12:15:57 EDT 2022 | kumarb
We have the Emerald-X (Yamaha YV88X) and used this article and software for our machine. Working very well. https://www.philscomputerlab.com/gotek-floppy-emulator.html# Perhaps consider the software from the above link.
Electronics Forum | Tue Mar 15 15:10:57 EDT 2022 | kumarb
Hi. New to P-tools for Yamaha YV88X use. Just created the line1 -> machine1 details -> appear to be able to create fresh board data but doing so manually. Is it possible to import in VIOS text formatted CAD data into this tool ? That is, impo
Electronics Forum | Sun Mar 24 16:53:44 EST 2002 | mikestringer
We place a similar square pin style of connector on one of our products. The connector is a 22mm high HW series from Samtek. We have a Yamaha YVL88 MK1 and YV88XS set up to handle them (Yes they are rebadged as Philips machines in some markets). No
Electronics Forum | Wed Mar 10 01:44:37 EST 2004 | lawrence
Hi All, I've been using Yamaha YV88 MII for quite some times, It's a good workhorse but have this little problem. We find difficulty in locating the Laser Unit. Also it's costs are high from where we get it. Would appreciate SMTnet members assistance
Electronics Forum | Thu Jun 24 08:05:21 EDT 2021 | vinitverma
That's the correct way when optimizing a new program or with less part numbers. But when reoptimizing a running program, it may not be so convenient to change all feeder numbers to '0'. Here is where changing the position to 'Relative' helps without
Electronics Forum | Fri Jul 30 05:16:04 EDT 2021 | compit
Ok i did this: when optimizing PCBs, you can add "fixed PCB" - the machine treats this PCB as the one for which the feeders have reserved space. I enter places in such a PCB that are to be omitted during the allocation. It works very well - selected
.gif)
