PCB Libraries, Inc. | https://www.pcblibraries.com/Forum/saving-solder-mask-settings_topic1817.html
(+/-). This is to allow for errors in the solder mask alignment, and is required by most PC board houses. Some just automatically add it, others charge more for a die cut mask if you do not provide it
PCB Libraries, Inc. | https://www.pcblibraries.com/forum/saving-solder-mask-settings_topic1817.html
(+/-). This is to allow for errors in the solder mask alignment, and is required by most PC board houses. Some just automatically add it, others charge more for a die cut mask if you do not provide it
PCB Libraries, Inc. | https://www.pcblibraries.com/forum/topic1817&OB=DESC.html
(+/-). This is to allow for errors in the solder mask alignment, and is required by most PC board houses. Some just automatically add it, others charge more for a die cut mask if you do not provide it
PCB Libraries, Inc. | https://www.pcblibraries.com/Forum/topic1390&OB=DESC.html
. I don't know about everyone else but due to the silkscreen legend length of these devices our board houses by default (since we are 100% class 3) removes the silkscreen from them, since the silk is almost a large as the device anyway, and naked eye visual inspection is next to impossible
PCB Libraries, Inc. | https://www.pcblibraries.com/forum/silkscreen-suppression-on-microminiature-packages_topic1390.html
suppression on these very small components. I don't know about everyone else but due to the silkscreen legend length of these devices our board houses by default (since we are 100% class 3
PCB Libraries, Inc. | https://www.pcblibraries.com/forum/silkscreen-suppression-on-microminiature-packages_topic1390_post5567.html
suppression on these very small components. I don't know about everyone else but due to the silkscreen legend length of these devices our board houses by default (since we are 100% class 3
PCB Libraries, Inc. | https://www.pcblibraries.com/forum/topic1390&OB=ASC.html
suppression on these very small components. I don't know about everyone else but due to the silkscreen legend length of these devices our board houses by default (since we are 100% class 3
PCB Libraries, Inc. | https://www.pcblibraries.com/forum/topic1390&OB=DESC.html
. I don't know about everyone else but due to the silkscreen legend length of these devices our board houses by default (since we are 100% class 3) removes the silkscreen from them, since the silk is almost a large as the device anyway, and naked eye visual inspection is next to impossible
PCB Libraries, Inc. | https://www.pcblibraries.com/forum/silkscreen-suppression-on-microminiature-packages_topic1390_post5568.html
suppression on these very small components. I don't know about everyone else but due to the silkscreen legend length of these devices our board houses by default (since we are 100% class 3
Imagineering, Inc. | https://www.pcbnet.com/blog/making-the-most-of-smaller-components-with-hdi-pcbs/
. This has been possible with the advancements of printed circuit boards (PCBs). PCBs have been shrinking in size which puts PCB fabrication houses under pressure to continue this trend of smaller and denser chips and make sure all the circuitry is running off these smaller chips