Electronics Forum: fuji cp 742e and cp 742me (Page 1 of 6)

Re: obective comparison between siplace and fuji pick and place equipment

Electronics Forum | Sat Oct 10 09:01:46 EDT 1998 | Al Carrillo

| we currently have a siplace line(80s/f) and are inhereting a fuji line from another site. I need an objective comparison between the two. What are the strengths and weaknesses of the fuji with regard to programming, operating and maintenance. any c

Re: obective comparison between siplace and fuji pick and place equipment

Electronics Forum | Sat Oct 10 18:35:18 EDT 1998 | phillip hunter

| we currently have a siplace line(80s/f) and are inhereting a fuji line from another site. I need an objective comparison between the two. What are the strengths and weaknesses of the fuji with regard to programming, operating and maintenance. any c

Re: Siemens HS50 and F5 and S25

Electronics Forum | Wed Dec 06 23:12:09 EST 2000 | Brad

Chris, Have you considered Fuji? The robustness of Fuji is proven. I have recently done floor space analysis and cost per placement/sqr foot studies. I have also performed ROI studies on these machines. The new CP7 machine from Fuji outperforms th

Fuji Pick and Place Machines

Electronics Forum | Mon May 10 17:21:03 EDT 2004 | smt..

I work with Fuji equipment For over 10yrs�. Cp3, cp4.cp6.cp7, ip1, ip2, ip3, qp341, qp242, qp351. Also, work with MYDATA, SAMSUN, and QUAD AMISTAR�. Fuji is the best in my opinion.

Fuji Pick and Place Machines

Electronics Forum | Mon May 10 17:21:08 EDT 2004 | smt..

I work with Fuji equipment For over 10yrs�. Cp3, cp4.cp6.cp7, ip1, ip2, ip3, qp341, qp242, qp351. Also, work with MYDATA, SAMSUN, and QUAD AMISTAR�. Fuji is the best in my opinion.

Fuji Pick and Place Machines

Electronics Forum | Fri Oct 08 17:07:19 EDT 2004 | Christopher

Hi > > For throughput seimens is the best and > footprint is smallest Fuji Machine ist the best on the world. I working on the Cp 6,CP 7, QP 3421 and Qp 351. Best regards Christopher

Fuji CP3 and 2mm pitch tape

Electronics Forum | Tue Jan 14 15:38:28 EST 2003 | fujispares

Hi, CP3 will have trouble placing 0603 parts - I wouldn`t use a CP3 for these parts - A CP4 will be more suitable. A older CP4 feeder will fit and function on a CP3.

Design and manu.

Electronics Forum | Thu May 26 00:42:19 EDT 2005 | nicholas2005

Ok, I just need someone to give me some feed back on a few questions I have. If anyone could help me that would be great. Example: take a Fuji CP-4 feeder for instance! If I machine my own, place my own parts on it, and place my own company name, and

High-end SPI and AOI?

Electronics Forum | Tue Oct 13 22:56:22 EDT 2009 | cpcompany

Can anyone help me recommend or simulate a SPI > and AOI machine that can balance our FUJI NXT 1 > with 14 modules. We are using MPM accela printer. > 200 UPH is our target. > > Here's the PCB > dimension > > length(x) = 399.92mm width(y) = >

Fuji CP4 and 0402 placement

Electronics Forum | Fri May 23 07:07:39 EDT 2003 | qp1

Please your comments for placing 0402 on CP4? Which are the difficulties to expect and how to threat them? How to adapt the feeders for the smaller interdistance of the tape?? Thanks

  1 2 3 4 5 6 Next

fuji cp 742e and cp 742me searches for Companies, Equipment, Machines, Suppliers & Information