Electronics Forum | Tue Dec 02 06:44:59 EST 2014 | cbeneat
Here's what I found online, 602 Placement accuracy ±40µm/chip (Cpk1) If you need the flexibility to switch from ultrahigh-speed placement to multi-functionality on site, the CM402 high-speed interchangeable platform, modular placement machine is the
Electronics Forum | Mon Sep 24 06:01:38 EDT 2018 | lozie
hello, I suppose you didn't put any placement offset in the component placement settings. did you perform the general calibration of the lasers? with the supplied calibration tool that comes with the machine. check MSP parameters, as there might b
Electronics Forum | Tue Oct 02 10:02:03 EDT 2018 | emeto
Now you are going too deep. Purchasing should have nothing to do with your placement cost. Reducing part numbers too. These are separate processes and should be evaluated separately. You have: 1. Machine time and cost -utilities -maintenance -consu
Electronics Forum | Wed Feb 23 16:25:33 EST 2000 | John
We are using a glue and wave solder process for primarily chip components. Our products do not use any fine pitch components. What would an acceptable benchmark for the placement defect rate be? 50 DPMO? 100 DPMO? 200 DPMO? Thanks in advance,
Electronics Forum | Tue Jun 13 06:04:47 EDT 2000 | mulitze
Hi! Do you want to know how the machine works or do you want to know something about the quality of the machine or placement? As far as I know, the quality of the machine and of the placement is not bad. Best regards.
Electronics Forum | Wed Feb 23 16:25:33 EST 2000 | John
We are using a glue and wave solder process for primarily chip components. Our products do not use any fine pitch components. What would an acceptable benchmark for the placement defect rate be? 50 DPMO? 100 DPMO? 200 DPMO? Thanks in advance,
Electronics Forum | Tue Feb 06 18:17:26 EST 2001 | davef
Most prominent placement machine suppliers understand well the capability index of their machines and can ship each machine with specific information on the capability of that machine in a very nice bound volume. You should contact the companies of
Electronics Forum | Thu Feb 22 12:31:20 EST 2001 | markkrmp
Has anybody out there had any experience in using the Sony/TDK Placement Equipment in a production environment? I would appreciate any feedback good or bad. User friendly, maintainability, reliability, maintenance, etc ..... Thanks
Electronics Forum | Sun Jul 29 08:57:37 EDT 2001 | davef
Most placement machine suppliers know this information. They periodically commission studies to determine market size and share. They up-date this with surveys completed by their sales representatives. If a placement machine supplier thought you w
Electronics Forum | Thu Nov 18 10:48:42 EST 1999 | Roger Scalia
With the low volume and low parts mix Quad 100's, Quad IIIC"s or Quad IVC's would be a low cost method of placement. As for ovens most any 5 to 7 zone oven will work for you. Thanks,
