Electronics Forum | Wed Aug 10 08:10:39 EDT 2005 | davef
Comments are: * Sounds like it's necessary to clean "heareous F381, F352 no clean solder paste" in your application. Consider a paste that may be better suited to your application. * If you're cleaning "low residue flux", consider using an organic ac
Electronics Forum | Tue Aug 16 06:03:37 EDT 2005 | grantp
Hi, Are they no clean fluxes? Regards, Grant
Electronics Forum | Tue Aug 16 09:13:28 EDT 2005 | russ
It appears that the flux was burnt over the wave process. I have seen this before. Are you using convection heat?
Electronics Forum | Wed Aug 17 22:25:05 EDT 2005 | davef
As others said, it appears that this mask and than flux are not compatible.
Electronics Forum | Tue Aug 30 08:00:34 EDT 2005 | Rob
Tap water will leave residues, whereas de-mineralised/de-ionized shouldn't.
Electronics Forum | Mon Mar 27 08:43:36 EST 2006 | jdengler
Is the flux rated for lead free temps?
Electronics Forum | Mon Mar 27 09:58:19 EST 2006 | samir
When you say "unacceptable" do you mean cosmetically unacceptable? I've always put as much flux (no clean, of course) on the board until the ICT guys start yelling at me. That's how I roll... Lots of factors with no-clean flux residues...board mas
Electronics Forum | Tue Mar 28 11:20:48 EST 2006 | smartasp
Hi Loz The profile is generatet and verivied with the Latest model of KIC. Smartasp
Electronics Forum | Tue Mar 28 11:22:53 EST 2006 | smartasp
Hi Jdengler Yes it is. Made sure of that before use. Smartasp
Electronics Forum | Wed Mar 29 15:20:58 EST 2006 | Chunks
After reading that, I have to go bang my head on the wave.
.png)