Electronics Forum | Fri Mar 03 14:43:04 EST 2006 | amol_kane
the latest circuits assembly mazagine features an article on this by Karl Seelig
Electronics Forum | Thu Apr 06 18:22:53 EDT 2006 | russ
Anyone using the new SACX from Alpha?
Electronics Forum | Fri Mar 03 13:44:36 EST 2006 | Jon Provost
We switched to Sn100C on 2 waves and kept one with SAC305. The SAC305 will be converted to SN100C as soon as the Aim rep. delivers it next week.
Electronics Forum | Thu Apr 06 17:42:59 EDT 2006 | GS
found this interesting comparison (SAC305 SN100C) http://www.nihonsuperior.co.jp/english/data/pdf/nse2_1.pdf Regards..........GS
Electronics Forum | Fri May 19 13:40:36 EDT 2006 | grantp
Hi, Sorry to drag this thread up again, but we were recommended to change the wave to SAC305, but is everyone recommending SN100C? That seems to be the feeling on this thread. What flux is used? Regards, Grant
Electronics Forum | Fri Jan 20 08:27:28 EST 2006 | Loco
Just wondering what the companies that are use SN100C are using for reflow (I guess SAC), and especially for handsoldering. Do SAC and SN100C mix? are there any studies proving this?
Electronics Forum | Thu May 25 19:21:58 EDT 2006 | grantp
Hi, So that's really important to have a specific flux for lead free? We are looking at changing to SN100C after reading this thread and other stuff we have found, so can anyone recommend the best no clean flux for that metal? Do you need differen
Electronics Forum | Fri Mar 31 15:49:51 EST 2006 | GS
Hi Marcus, by using SN100C have you seen any tearing phenomena like what shown on the link ? http://www.smartgroup.org/pdf/Defect01.pdf Tnks Regards.........GS
Electronics Forum | Mon Jan 02 08:54:58 EST 2006 | aj
has anyone used or trialed the SACX from Alpha, from reportes and studies carried out it seems that its a go between SAC305 and SN100.
Electronics Forum | Fri Dec 30 10:12:27 EST 2005 | Cmiller
Joseph, thank you for your comments. Can I ask what kind of flux you are using?
