Electronics Forum | Tue Jul 27 13:14:36 EDT 1999 | Bill Bannister
| | We are currently using a 65/35 solder for our wave process but are considering switching to a 63/37 for a substantial cost savings. No one here seems to know why we everused a 65/35 formulation in the first place. | | I understand 63/37 to be pre
Electronics Forum | Thu Jul 29 19:30:44 EDT 1999 | Boca
| | | We are currently using a 65/35 solder for our wave process but are considering switching to a 63/37 for a substantial cost savings. No one here seems to know why we everused a 65/35 formulation in the first place. | | | I understand 63/37 to be
Electronics Forum | Wed Sep 16 08:46:50 EDT 1998 | Chrys
Hi Folks, Need to draw upon the vast expertise in this forum... Whenever you fill a new wave solder machine with fresh bar solder, it seems to produce more than the normal amount of dross for a few weeks. I always understood this to be the solder "c
Electronics Forum | Tue Jul 14 15:21:28 EDT 1998 | Brian Conner
| We are wave soldering a board having 24 similar thru hole connectors on it, using a wave soldering pallet. The problem is that one particular pin of connector in around 6-9 connectors get excess solder on the bottom side. I have tried all the par
Electronics Forum | Fri Nov 17 19:28:36 EST 2006 | rob@spinpcb.com
What kind of board finish do you have? You describe solder bubbles...and when you remove them, you find open vias. Are you, by chance, discovering flux contained in these bubbles? We've been experiencing the same thing with pb-free soldering on a
Electronics Forum | Wed Mar 14 07:30:14 EDT 2007 | davef
So, you toss whatever is on the stencil every 8 hours. Correct? How long has it been on the stencil? * If that particular paste has been on the stencil for 8 hours, we'd agree to toss it too. * If paste has been on the stencil for less than 8 hour
Electronics Forum | Tue Jul 27 14:09:51 EDT 1999 | JohnW
| | | We are currently using a 65/35 solder for our wave process but are considering switching to a 63/37 for a substantial cost savings. No one here seems to know why we everused a 65/35 formulation in the first place. | | | I understand 63/37 to be
Electronics Forum | Tue Nov 29 17:27:38 EST 2016 | dyoungquist
We have been using SN100C in our RPS Rhythm selective solder machine since we bought it in 2008 with good success. No issues with the solder pot. We are setting the pot temperature to 300C.
Electronics Forum | Mon May 09 09:02:17 EDT 2005 | davef
Your 316L stainless steel pot will not contain lead-free solder, over the long term. We'd bet that our solder machine equipment manufacturer will "swap" you a lead-free solder compatable pot for your current pot.
Electronics Forum | Tue Feb 08 19:10:09 EST 2005 | DasonC
Lead free is not define as NO lead and "a maximum concentration value of 0.1% by weight in homogeneous materials for lead shall be tolerated." Check below link. So replaced your solder from the pot when exceed 0.1%. http://www.leadfree.org/files
.png)
winsouce.jpg)