Electronics Forum | Mon Oct 09 14:30:44 EDT 2006 | Brian
I agree with Chunks. Programming was much simpler. The 2D inspection is much better on MPM. I didn't have to use offsets on the MPM or the DEK very often, but did more on teh DEK. I didn't like the front justified stencils on the DEK. I also did
Electronics Forum | Wed Nov 29 11:49:57 EST 2006 | slthomas
That, and is it pinned or clamped, and if the latter, are the edges true?
Electronics Forum | Thu Jul 25 18:49:12 EDT 2002 | Dreamsniper
Has anyone compared the 2 machines performance? Which one has the edge? What are their disadvantages and the common problems they give the users? thanks in advance...
Electronics Forum | Thu Jul 25 20:47:13 EDT 2002 | Dreamsniper
Thanks for that info... I found out that MPM has UP2000 HiE VP with price lower than DEK Horizon but just a bit higher or let's say relatively the same as DEK ELA...I find it hard to decide which among the 2 based on our budget capability. My budget
Electronics Forum | Wed May 20 10:00:00 EDT 1998 | EFData
The quick frame does work well with the DEK 265, but we feel that tensioning is user dependent and introduces variation into the process on an operator to operator basis. Also, because tensioning occurs only on two sides (instead of four) this also i
Electronics Forum | Thu Dec 16 15:00:20 EST 2004 | glaucon
Simple differences. Both processes require a very similar machine platform, controlled motion, vision fiducial recognition and alignment of a substrate (PCB or hybrid ceramic) to the "image", the image being either a stencil (hence stencil printing)
winsouce.jpg)
