Electronics Forum | Thu Feb 24 12:08:15 EST 2005 | siverts
Checked the condition of your nozzles? Vacuum ok? Dummy part picked from the same feeder position? Dummy part picked from the very same feeder? How often does this problem occur? How many dummys did you pick for comparison? Sometimes a feeder calibr
Electronics Forum | Thu Sep 29 05:37:56 EDT 2005 | dougs
for 0402's you should be able to run the turret at full speed, if you need to slow it down it means that your machine isn't set up properly. use the vision number that the manual tells you and make sure your feeders are properly calibrated, poorly c
Electronics Forum | Fri Feb 10 12:33:36 EST 2006 | russ
We do something quite simple that may or may not be adequate but I cannot think of why it would not be adequate. If anybody can please inform. We have a large board about the samer width as our oven. We have dedicated thermocouples on this board a
Electronics Forum | Mon Apr 10 12:54:43 EDT 2006 | cyber_wolf
Is anyone out there using the newer style Fuji feeder calibration jig ? It's the one that has the LCD on it. My current feeder cal jig just measures pick point center. This newer style gauge measures advancing arm height,bend in the advancing arm br
Electronics Forum | Fri Aug 25 23:54:26 EDT 2006 | mika
If You adjust the focus to perfection, You still need the UIC GSM calibration kit, so that the machine will know where the spindles are according to the cameras (OTHC, P2P:s, fiducial camera), X-Y-Theta-spindles, nozzle changer, feederbanks and mach
Electronics Forum | Fri Sep 22 13:21:26 EDT 2006 | cyber_wolf
Dax, Just an FYI....we have had AP25's for years. I have never had to calibrate them. Also, I am not a MPM service guy but I would have to say that if your standard deviation numbers are coming up less than .001" you are doing ok there. Sounds to m
Electronics Forum | Mon Jan 15 15:18:13 EST 2007 | jaimebc
We have an oMniflow 7 as well, and looking at the calibration procedure, it indicates that turning the pots ( total of 5 pots. 4 on the lower board and one on the upper board )fully counter-clockwise is the FIRST step of a series of tests. Then you w
Electronics Forum | Mon Jan 29 11:16:11 EST 2007 | geb
The front banks and head are fine. The rear ones aren't. When I look at how it has picked up a component, I have noticed that it is way off to the right (looking from the rear). This is ok for large components (TQFP, Tant Case A) but has caused the s
Electronics Forum | Wed Jan 31 19:16:46 EST 2007 | mika
BTW GEB; When you put the feeder in the front bank did you pick the comps with Head #2 and from the feeder bank just opposite from the rear non working feeder bank? Did you make your feeder banks fixed or is it already that? It just hits me, if you
Electronics Forum | Tue Mar 20 21:49:38 EDT 2007 | davef
Mark there is no need to YELL here. Turn it down, please. While you're waiting for other to reply, search the fine SMTnet Archives to find threads like: http://www.smtnet.com/forums/Index.cfm?CFApp=1&Message_ID=34512 You'll find that the followi
