Electronics Forum | Fri Jul 24 12:53:30 EDT 1998 | Brad Kendall
| | | I am considering of Philips FCM for the next production. | | | But I have heard a rumour saying this machine is not capable for checking the lead polarity due to the laser scan system. | | | i.e. SOT might be populated in wrong direction. | | |
Electronics Forum | Thu Aug 13 14:53:17 EDT 1998 | Timm
| | | | I am considering of Philips FCM for the next production. | | | | But I have heard a rumour saying this machine is not capable for checking the lead polarity due to the laser scan system. | | | | i.e. SOT might be populated in wrong direction.
Electronics Forum | Mon Jul 27 12:43:19 EDT 1998 | Adrian
| | | | I am considering of Philips FCM for the next production. | | | | But I have heard a rumour saying this machine is not capable for checking the lead polarity due to the laser scan system. | | | | i.e. SOT might be populated in wrong direction.
Electronics Forum | Wed Jun 03 11:17:17 EDT 1998 | Brian Stumm
If your board is single sided you should convey it on a mesh belt conveyor. Unfortunately most assemblies these days are double sided which makes it difficult to convey on the mesh belt. Plus with the increasing population on SM boards the weight is
Electronics Forum | Wed Jun 03 14:37:53 EDT 1998 | Anthony
I really appreciate everybody taking the time to help me out with this problem. I'm going to run your input by the design engineer, after that I may be taking you up on that offer to contact you Earl. Again; thank you! Anthony | If your board is si
Electronics Forum | Wed May 27 08:46:25 EDT 1998 | Dave F
| | | | We understand that testing for ionic contamination and surface insulation resistance measure different properties. We assemble printed circuit boards for other companies. We will not get combs on 90% of the boards that we assemble. | | | |
Electronics Forum | Wed May 27 12:32:15 EDT 1998 | Earl Moon
| | | | | We understand that testing for ionic contamination and surface insulation resistance measure different properties. We assemble printed circuit boards for other companies. We will not get combs on 90% of the boards that we assemble. | | |
Electronics Forum | Tue Apr 21 20:58:11 EDT 1998 | Steve Gregory
Mike wrote: ...I did buy "Surfboards" built for this purpose but they averaged about $5.oo a piece, and when your running 20 trainers, and they still have to be soldered in place. $5 a test is kinda high when evaluating a 32 cent chip...(snip) Hi
Electronics Forum | Tue Mar 17 11:16:15 EST 1998 | Scott Cook
| Children, | Let's stop the squabbling. SMTNET is here for us to use. It may run slower but it is still a very effective and necessary tool. It's amazing, as we progress further into the information age, we become spoiled and frustrated about an
Electronics Forum | Tue Mar 17 11:32:35 EST 1998 | Earl Moon
| | Children, | | Let's stop the squabbling. SMTNET is here for us to use. It may run slower but it is still a very effective and necessary tool. It's amazing, as we progress further into the information age, we become spoiled and frustrated about
