Electronics Forum | Fri Jul 09 20:54:58 EDT 2010 | bandjwet
There is no such thing as "IPCA610 compliance". The correct way of looking at this that the boards were inspected to IPC Class I, II or III Revision XX (current Rev is "E") and met all of the criteria. From a commercial standpoint it would greatly
Electronics Forum | Tue Aug 10 06:29:49 EDT 2004 | Nippy
Hello, I am in need of some assistance with a problem we are having with soldering some terminals... Basicaly I need to solder thin tabs onto a round metal post (hole through tab) We have been seeing poor quality joints, de-wetting and what looks l
Electronics Forum | Mon Jul 09 16:14:06 EDT 2007 | rgduval
A number of years ago in a previous life, we discussed laser marking 2-d matrix codes. We had a number of boards for customers that just were too populated to get any sort of a label onto. 2-D laser units were avaialable to work in line with our au
Electronics Forum | Thu Jan 12 22:29:10 EST 2023 | rgduval
So, as I understand it, IPC6012 are performance criteria that your board shop should be using. I think you'd want to be using IPC600 for acceptance criteria at incoming inspection. At least, that's what I always did in my CM days. And, since you'r
Electronics Forum | Wed Apr 08 14:46:34 EDT 2009 | boardhouse
The things to ask your board supplier would be: 1) Was the Pre-preg material that was used on this board within its Shelf life? and ask for the Incoming inspection CofC for the Pre-preg material. 2)Was this order shipped from Stock - this is why
| 1 |
