Stencil Printing of Small Apertures
Published: |
October 25, 2012 |
Author: |
William E. Coleman Ph.D. |
Abstract: |
First published in the 2012 IPC APEX EXPO technical conference proceedings. This paper will examine stencil technologies (including Laser and Electroform), Aperture Wall coatings (including Nickel-Teflon coatings and Nano-coatings), and how these parameters influence paste transfer for miniature devices with Area Ratios less than the standard recommended lower limit of .5. A matrix of print tests will be utilized to compare paste transfer and measure the effectiveness of the different stencil configurations. Area Ratios ranging from .32 to .68 will be investigated.... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
You must be a Company Information:
More articles from Photo Stencil LLC »
- Jul 25, 2023 - Step Stencil design when 01005 and 0.3mm pitch uBGA's coexist with RF Shields
- Jul 25, 2023 - Stencil Options for Printing Solder Paste for .3 Mm CSP's and 01005 Chip Components
- Jul 25, 2023 - Stencil Print solutions for Advance Packaging Applications
- Jun 12, 2023 - Stencil Design For Mixed Technology Through-Hole / Smt Placement And Reflow
- Nov 05, 2015 - Print Performance Studies Comparing Electroform and Laser-Cut Stencils
- See all SMT / PCB technical articles from Photo Stencil LLC »
More SMT / PCB assembly technical articles »
- Aug 20, 2024 - Thermal Interface Materials Drive Electronic Innovation | GPD Global
- Aug 20, 2024 - Underfill Materials Dispensing in Electronics Manufacturing Applications | GPD Global
- Jul 15, 2024 - Transforming LED Manufacturing: I.C.T Engineers Set Up Complete Production Line in Tajikistan | I.C.T ( Dongguan ICT Technology Co., Ltd. )
- Jun 20, 2024 - Case study: Precise Coating on Electronic Hearing Devices | ASYMTEK Products | Nordson Electronics Solutions
- Mar 19, 2024 - What is Underfill | GPD Global
- Browse Technical Library »
Stencil Printing of Small Apertures article has been viewed 974 times
davef
October 31, 2012
The Electroformed stencil with Nickel-Teflon plating had good transfer for each aperture size until the 150 micron opening. Why do you suppose that it had such a dramatic roll-off in transfer rate with that small aperture?